| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 3,928 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
452 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Don't know if it is a proof,rim is not squared off looking. But I do really like the look. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
I cut it from the proof cello myself.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
745 Posts |
Looks like a Philadelphia sleeve from a mint set
Tim Hughes
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Is that a struck through by the T on the half? John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4593 Posts |
Not SMS - they didn't create those until 1965.
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
That's an inaccurate statement BStrausse3. They tested the technique prior to '65 on a very limited run of '64 proofs.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
"1964 Special Strike Coins There are many different theories on why the 1964 SMS coins were produced. These coins could have been produced as prototypes for the 1965 to 1967 SMS coins. The 1964 SMS coins could have also been produced as introductory pieces, possibly even intended to include a 1964-D Peace dollar. Furthermore, it is believed these SMS coins came into existence somehow through the involvement of Eva Adams, U.S. Mint Director at the time. After Eva Adams passed away, her estate was sold off and well-recognized dealer and auctioneer Lester Merkin purchased many of the coins from her estate. Lester Merkin's collection was then sold in a Stack's auction in the early 1990s, including some, if not all, of the known 1964 SMS coins." From http://www.PCGScoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/5974
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
Hard to convey why in a photo but these seem better. The penny is the most telling.  
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
These were all taken under the same lighting conditions. See the texture on the suspected SMS Lincoln as opposed to the business strike? See the grainy smoothness of the fields of the suspected SMS and the '65 SMS but how they lack the mirrored proof depth? The level of care in which Proof type/SMS coins are handled during production is much higher than that of a business strike coin, even for a set.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Flatten those staples asap. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
452 Posts |
Is there a way to get them more flat? I already used pliers in the picture. Lol. I think it must have been a drop of water on the holder as opposed to a strike through btw.
Edited by durkastani 05/15/2017 12:25 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
They do make a flat stapler. I use a regular stapler and a pair of pliers on mine. Some of the staples in your pics don't look flat to me. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Here is a large image of the 1964 SMS cent: Click on the image to enlarge it.Note they don't look like proof cents and have a certain die scratch pattern when observed on closer inspection: Obverse:     Reverse:   Note the finish is not a proof. Your coin looks like it came from a proof set for 1964. Not the same this as the SMS coin. These are rare and probably less than 50-100 known. (or even less)
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 3,928 |
|