| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,086 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
The first details to leave upon the beginnings of circulation would be the marks on the cheek. They're too raw, too fresh, for me to believe the coin has circulated. From these images - understanding a different set under different lighting might change things - I have it at MS61. An alternative line of thought is that some of these marks cannot have been acquired except in circulation. If this is the TPG opinion, I would go along with it, not having had the coin in hand.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
308 Posts |
Grade is back, well is done at least. I like to not look until I get it back in hand, which should be on Tuesday. With the PCGS glamour shots, any opinion changes? I'll reveal the grade when I see it myself! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
I had one just like this, sent to Anacs, come back AU-58
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I'm holding at my original 55/58. Phil is good but he can't turn an AU coin into MS. (or can he?)
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
308 Posts |
I have to believe it will come back at 58, but am crossing my fingers because it is so close in hand...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
Guess I'll stick to my 1st choice of MS-61.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
Nice slider Unc...probably AU58
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6398 Posts |
Another vote for AU-58. The fields seem to retain enough original luster for an MS grade but the cheek discoloration is evidence of light circulation. On the plus side, the strike seems well above average for an O-mint Morgan.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
308 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,086 |