| Author |
Replies: 1,034 / Views: 64,603 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15575 Posts |
Quote: I finally tripped over one I loved Absolutely stunning example moxking of this treasured classic silver commemorative.  I had nearly the same multi year challenge to find 'my' MS Hawaiian ... the surfaces on nearly all turned me off for a very long time. Truly tempted to show my PCGS MS65/CAC example ... but resisting as my commitment to this outstanding thread is some commentary and discussion on the honestly circulated type set.  Enjoying all that all of you are posting.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
149 Posts |
Quote: I finally tripped over one I loved, with the more common matte finish, as follows: That's a stunner! So jealous of anyone who has one of these coins. Maybe someday when I win the lottery ...
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm a dork, are those scuffs in the left obverse field consistent in your mind with a 65?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Coin in hand doesn't show much of anything objectionable, including the area you mention.
My photo skills are pretty basic.
65 does not mean 70, or 68, or 66.
65 is a very nice coin. Not perfect.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
887 Posts |
Quote: This issue remains the last opening in my early commemorative collection. I have yet to find a coin I like when I have the $ to spend. I knew when I started collecting the series the Hawaiian was probably going to be my stopper. I was at the Sarasota coin show in October, and stumbled upon the Hawaiian I posted. There are quite a large number of improperly cleaned Hawaiians out there (there were 2 others at the show), and they all have really harsh lines from cleaning. This example was (relatively) reasonably priced, and has no hairlines, as the cleaning seems to have been a dip. I wouldn't have bought it with hairlines, but the dip doesn't bother me nearly as much. In hand, it comes close to looking like it would straight grade. The way I feel, I'm fortunate to have as MS Hawaiian in my collection, at a price I could comfortably afford. It will be the only one in my commem collection that will have been intentionally bought in a details grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7202 Posts |
1935 Hudson  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15575 Posts |
Chester Beach funky design for the Hudson half dollar always make me smile. Where else in USA coinage history are you going to find Neptune seated backwards on a whale? Or a mermaid blowing into a conch shell? How about the stylized partial moon? I suppose that was a tribute to Henry Hudson flagship Half Moon shown on the reverse ... but did Chester Beach realize he only gave us a quarter moon? My honestly circulated example is one of the visual favorites in that set ... not only for the design but also for the circulation cameo eye appeal. 1935 Hudson Sesquicentennial Half Dollar - PCGS VF35 Enjoy
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Loved your Hawaiian Beefer. Its a nice looking coin. Sometimes you have to LOOK for a nice cleaned example just to have one. I've been a beast about staying with uncleaned on most, but the early type are another area where you almost have to find a nice looking cleaned or never own one. I had a battle with the Hudson. I really looked long and hard for a great obverse strike. No matter how many I looked at in the 64-66 range, I didn't find one that was great. This one is the best of the bunch, but still not what I'd call a strong strike. I don't know if a truly strong strike even exists. I've never seen one.    NOTE that there are a number of scratches on the holder that are not on the coin. PCGS is so darned soft.
Edited by moxking 03/18/2018 08:58 am
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15575 Posts |
Quote: I don't know if a truly strong strike even exists. I've never seen one. Fully concur with that statement. I finally settled on an 'acceptable' MS66 example after looking at a lot of coins. Strike quality (or lack thereof) is one aspect of collecting the classic set that our modern commemorative collectors are not challenged with. Modern example in MS69 with fully razor sharp features are the norm ... good luck with that goal on any of the classic series.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
Quote: I don't know if a truly strong strike even exists. I've never seen one. The one muddler posted above has one of the nicest strikes and toning I've seen. Neptune's face usually looks bashed in and flat. I'm still searching for one for my set.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
246 Posts |
My recently sold Hudson  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
mox and peaece - Nice Hudsons to be sure!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
887 Posts |
The Hudson is one of 5 that I don't have. Partly because of not finding one I like (good strike, some color), and partly because I hate the price. It is one of the goofiest coins ever minted by the US in my opinion, and that goofiness is also a reason I want to find my perfect example.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Goofy for sure. The only bad thing about the 50 type are the ones you hate but have to buy - Monroe and Sesquicentennial comes to mind.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
And Wisconsin and Delaware and Iowa and... 
Edited by Coinfrog 03/18/2018 8:54 pm
|
| |
Replies: 1,034 / Views: 64,603 |