Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1858 Indian Head Cent - Fake Or Real?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 13,689Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
desertgem's Avatar
United States
860 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2008  08:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add desertgem to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

The reverse is not the 1859 so it can't be an altered 1859 issue. The 1859 is the oak wreath and not the laurel wreath of the pattern.
The 208 is the same design as the 209 except a Cu-Ni as indicated.

As to why so inexpensive ( if real), there is much less demand and it is an "odd duck" being a pattern rather
than a regular issue like an 1877. It will be interesting to watch.

Jim
Valued Member
jeffreyice1's Avatar
United States
381 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2008  09:24 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jeffreyice1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
desertgem, If you've got a 1859 with oak let me know! I thought it was the laurel wreath with six leafs.

I could not wait, So I emailed him to see if he would be willing to change the return policy to give enough time to verify the coin. This was the responce.

Dear jeffreyice1,

Yes. No problem at all to varify that this is a genuine U.S. pattern coin for the cent.


- olduscoins
Edited by jeffreyice1
08/06/2008 10:30 am
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2008  12:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Again, if there are only "2-3 known" in existence, how come it's not worth substantially more?

Only a handful of people collect patterns so demand is low for most of them- rarity does not always equal high value. I would bet that there are more than 2-3(still probably single or low double digits though), where did that figure come from?

And I do not really care what the seller guarantees- if he is careless enough to hold a potentially rare and expensive pattern coin in his fingers, heavily circulated or not, then IMO he loses any "expertise" he may have.
Edited by biokemist6
08/06/2008 12:33 pm
Pillar of the Community
1sikevo's Avatar
United States
1130 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2008  1:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1sikevo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just curious...
Since the demand for pattern coins is low, how did the 56 FE become so popular ?
Pillar of the Community
halfabustisbetter's Avatar
United States
1984 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2008  2:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add halfabustisbetter to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That's a great question, and one which I am sure someone can answer more accurately than I. It seems that once a coin gets listed as part of the series (I don't think the 1856 should EVER have been listed as part of the series, and I question the impartiality and judgment of those that placed it there), then the genie is out of the bottle. Once there's a space for it in a Whitman, then you can't complete the series unless you have that coin. It's circular logic, and it's WAY past time to remove the 1856 Flying Eagle cent from the list of 'coins' in the series. Since the FE wasn't approved for circulation until the 1857 issue, the 1856 is not a legit part of the series in my book.
Bedrock of the Community
biokemist6's Avatar
United States
12437 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2008  2:09 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add biokemist6 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1856 FE is a more interesting case study. While it is technically considered a pattern, it did not follow the guidelines of traditional patterns. Most patterns have a mintage in the single digits, some a bit higher, but almost never over 100. The mintage of FEs is estimated to be about 1500 but not all of them were minted at the same time. Demand was so great that another striking took place, presumably the source of the business strike example. This was the first usage of nickel in US coinage and it was the first small cent. Its design is essentially identical to the 1857 and 58 issues, whereas most patterns are normally a bit different design from the circulating counterpart. About the only other pattern I can think of that would mimic the 1856 FE is the $4 Stellas.
Edited by biokemist6
08/06/2008 2:10 pm
Pillar of the Community
desertgem's Avatar
United States
860 Posts
 Posted 08/06/2008  5:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add desertgem to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Jefferyice, I stand corrected. I have to learn not to post so early in the morning. Thanks ,

Jim
  Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 13,689Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums