| Author |
Replies: 271 / Views: 23,701 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95324 Posts |
amazing Libertads! (don't let Gary see these.. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187950 Posts |
Quote: Mexico 8 Reales 1878. Contemporary counterfeit, weighing 26.07 g (as opposed to 27.97); traces of silvering remain. A genuine example from 1877 is below. Very nice! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17906 Posts |
Fake 1894 Spanish 5 Pesetas. There are moulding lines around the reverse rim, the underlying brass is showing through, the 'star date' in the right-hand star is wrong and the last digit of the date looks crude and appears to have been punched over another, probably so that the forger could produce coins with a variety of dates: Coin is also about 2g underweight, and the edge motifs are surprisingly crisp and clear when considering the apparent wear on the obverse and reverse. Fakes like this have been seen in street markets all over Spain since the early 1980s  Genuine coin: 
Edited by NumisRob 09/05/2024 1:58 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
187950 Posts |
Nice comparison! 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95324 Posts |
very nice examples Rob Can you tell me if there is any numbers or text in the Star by the 4 of the date?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17906 Posts |
Quote: Can you tell me if there is any numbers or text in the Star by the 4 of the date? On the fake it looks like 32. On the genuine coin it's 94 (correct for the type) but it's very badly worn. Another thing that gives away the top coin as a fake is the mint officials' initials - the combination MS-M for Morejon, Sala and Mendoza would have been correct for a coin of King Alfonso XII issued in the 1880s, but in 1894 the officials were Peiro, Garcia and Vega (PG-V). The counterfeiters evidently used one reverse die to make coins of different reigns and dates.
Edited by NumisRob 09/05/2024 5:33 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95324 Posts |
a 32 huh? well that would be way wrong for this coin. Thanks for looking at that Rob. Spain has/had a habit of placing the coin's actual date inside the stars.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
25051 Posts |
Nice example, NumisRob! Quote: Spain has/had a habit of placing the coin's actual date inside the stars. And I thought that was a 20th Century thing!
Inordinately fascinated by bits of metal with strange markings and figures
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
73895 Posts |
Nice fake, NumisRob.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
381 Posts |
Just wondering if the weight of the Spanish or Mexican 8 Reales varied over the years like the English five shillings did...
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
381 Posts |
Thinking on... I've just got my 1804 five shilling bank token out that's struck over a Mexican 8 Reales and that weighs 26.82 grams. On the strength of the earlier post about early fake pieces of eight I got my metal detector out and scanned the coin. It came up as mostly silver. I'm wondering if the composition is 83.3%, like Talers.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95324 Posts |
can you post up that coin Spyro?
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
381 Posts |
Will do, it will be late Sunday/early Monday British Summer Time though cos I'm away at the moment.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
95324 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
2133 Posts |
Quote: The bimetallic £2 coin, introduced in 1997, is the UK's highest value circulating coin, worth a bit more than $2. With reference to NumisRob's post about GB £2 coins on page 1, here's another one. This one looks to be monometallic, though the centre is a slightly different colour from the outer ring. It is not magnetic. The legend on the edge is correct but quite faint. The milling looks correct. The rim on the obverse seems to have overflowed and is covering the edge beads. The IRB initials under the head are joined by a blob and the queen's hair is almost flat. I suspect this is a forgery, but this is the first I've seen. I received it in change at a Home Bargains store in Scotland.  
Edited by Pertinax 09/08/2024 03:56 am
|
| |
Replies: 271 / Views: 23,701 |