Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1978 D Jefferson Nickel Full Steps?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 2,520Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 09/01/2019  3:50 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I guess I would rather collect something that is reality, rather than speculative. So I prefer die varieties.
Pillar of the Community
mdpmedia's Avatar
United States
3546 Posts
 Posted 09/01/2019  5:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mdpmedia to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If this is applicable, what proof coins are the most collectible years and why?
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 09/01/2019  5:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I prefer the proof coins before the 1971 era. I don't like the look of the cameo on the post 1971 coins. I like the smoother cameos, not the rough looking ones that reminds me of shredded wheat. Also the spagetti hair on the Washington quarters. The frosting on the newer cameos, hides doubled die so much, you can miss them or not be impressed with them.
Pillar of the Community
mdpmedia's Avatar
United States
3546 Posts
 Posted 09/01/2019  10:48 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mdpmedia to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
...surprising full steps.


To say the least and as an illustrative example I would have never submitted this 1968-S 66 FS to the TPG seeing this following photo of its steps:

1978-D-Jefferson-Nickel-Full-Steps?

One can find this disturbing example below and recall how many times an expensive one fell through the cracks only because the perceived difference between that of 'what it is' vs 'what it should be' is not clearly understood at all.

This FS sold for only $ 3737. :(

https://coins.ha.com/itm/jefferson-...itage-081514

I would like an explanation as to why this example passed the criteria to be a FS. And have the rules changed over time in terms of allowing a FS designation?
Edited by mdpmedia
09/01/2019 10:49 pm
Pillar of the Community
United States
3207 Posts
 Posted 09/01/2019  11:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add nick10 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
mdpmedia, I can't imagine the lower right on those steps ever qualifying as full, unless the steps show better in different light

others will disagree, but IMO small hits on the steps do not disqualify a coin from full steps since the hits came after the coin was struck, and steps are counted as a measure of strike quality
  Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 2,520Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums