| Author |
Replies: 7,432 / Views: 401,771 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7994 Posts |
Quote: However, unless we find a replacement for @louie, I'm not sure that we will catch the 5th edition Last time through, @pepactonius was the only one with 1491, and @ gallienus was the only one with 1486. I've not managed to get either of those dates in the last two years. After that it was well into the 1470s before things slowed down. But, yeah, reaching 1461 again could be tough...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5186 Posts |
Quote: However, unless we find a replacement for @louie Technically we already did that in the 5th edition, but I admit that 1) we had @pepactonius at the time, and 2) even so 1486 was lucky. I would definitely miss @louie, but I've been told that the CCF mod team's disagreements with them are unsalvageable. I'm still low-key looking into 15th century dated Islamic coins, but as of right now I'm up to "one, maybe". (A lot more from the 14th century, but that doesn't help.) I hope I manage to get more by the time the thread gets there (circa late June, I believe).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7994 Posts |
Maybe @pepactoniuus will be back by 1491? Anyhow, I think it's a fun ride no matter when it ends. The 5th edition when I was fairly new to CCF got me much more deeply involved in collecting areas where I was just dabbling, so I'm grateful for that. @1607 Poland 1 groschen, Krakow mint (sorry, but now 3 more weeks of mostly Siggy portraits from me).  
|
|
Moderator
  United States
192227 Posts |
Quote: Is anyone thinking that we should start Edition 7 soon. As stated above, we would want this one to catch up to the fifth first. However, since I have all the power...  If this one stalls for at least a month I will consider forfeiting it to start a seventh edition. This one would be locked and the fifth would remain the champion, open to move backward. Sound good? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7994 Posts |
Makes sense to me. But it would be very tough to have to admit we took over a year and a half just to lose to the champ 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5186 Posts |
Quote: Sound good? Not really. My option: if we end up stalling for over a month before catching up, you can start the 7th edition (if you want), but do not lock this one. We would then technically have three editions going on (two of them in the 15th century) until either 6 catches up to 5 (at which point 5 is locked and we're back to two), 7 catches up to 6 (at which point 6 is locked, and 8 is started; then we're back at three but the numbers have shifted), or, theoretically, 7 stalls for over a month (then start a new active edition, and so on, locking every edition that a newer one caught up to, and starting one more if it was the newest active pair that caught up). Anything else would mean that people waiting to post their 1470s/1460s coins would have to wait until we get all the way through the last five centuries again, which is extremely inconvenient. Who knows if @Spence or @tdziemia will even still be here in 2023?
|
|
Moderator
  United States
192227 Posts |
I really do not want three topics open at one time. If we have to wait, we wait. This is part of the challenge.
So, just forget my suggestion about locking six and leaving five to open seven. Just do your best to get this one where it needs to be.
I will reconsider all our options if this one stalls.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7994 Posts |
Quote: Who knows if @Spence or @tdziemia will even still be here in 2023? Now you've got me worried... 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34504 Posts |
Here is a twin brother to @tdz's coin for today:  
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7994 Posts |
Quote: twin brother to @tdz's coin Though both Kop.781, there were lots of die varieties that year. Yours has REX POLON and a "normal" beard; mine has REX PO and that strange beard that sticks out into the legend. 1606 Poland 1 groschen  
|
|
Moderator
  United States
192227 Posts |
Quote: Now you've got me worried... 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
18131 Posts |
Edited by NumisRob 03/11/2021 03:09 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7994 Posts |
Nice! I am sure viewers are getting pretty sick of the Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth. 1605 Poland 1 denar, Poznan mint. As mentioned upthread, our 11th denomination under Sigismund III (obv photo was used to show scale on the "Tiny Coin" thread)..  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
4628 Posts |
Good on you Numis Rob, definitely agree about the 6d, 2nd coinage 1604/19 and mintmark along with the word Quad starting inscription.
All thanks to that Crown my rich Kiwi friend showed me last weekend. I got to hold a James I crown, but in fact all I could afford off him was a battered 1925 Aussie Florin!!! The Crown was only dated with mintmark (Lis 105) and it looked similar to the first coinage one (1603 - 1604), showing the King on horseback with square decorated saddle but check that inscription.
J Buck, agree, but realistically how many of us have 15th century dated coins? 95% of us have exclusively 19th and 20th century coins with a few older, my last coin here was 1635 and oldest with a date was 1656.
Edited by Princetane 03/11/2021 12:49 pm
|
|
Moderator
  United States
192227 Posts |
Most can go farther than me. My oldest is 1806. 
|
| |
Replies: 7,432 / Views: 401,771 |