| Author |
 Replies: 10 / Views: 2,319 |
|
|
New Member
Canada
10 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7628 Posts |
64 Red to these tired old eyes.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
395 Posts |
This is a great cross over coin for sure. When this was in ICCS was either 63 or a 64(depending on when it was graded), the fields are super baggy but the colour looks stellar. In contrast the devices here are looking great for a lack of marks, eye appeal amazing, strike is good for the series but is certainly not perfect, so I'll say PCGS gave it a 65. I'm sure they wanted to go 66 but too many reasons not to. This is exactly the type of coin I would crossover.
Edit: Forgot to mention red for both PCGS and ICCS but I don't think anyone would question that with this coin.
Edited by Talonbat
10/12/2020 10:21 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1622 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
89 Posts |
I too will say MS-64 red.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
MS-65+ Red, the eye-appeal probably earned the 'plus' in my opinion; great colour, great looking coin.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
321 Posts |
Ms-65 RD, the reverse field is so clean  |
|
Valued Member
Canada
201 Posts |
I'd be willing to put money on this coin being at least MS-65RD with the confidence of stating this is likely a MS-65+RD
From experience, this is a beautiful problem free coin.
|
|
New Member
 Canada
10 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 2,319 |
|
Posted 10/12/2020 8:41 pm
