First Page
Posted 12/13/2008 4:24 pm
biochemist - Thanks for the links, I particually enjoyed reading the Lucent report:
http://www.interceptshield.com/full..._report.html
From what I read on their website, Lucent has simply developed a polymer....it's more of just an absorbant material IMO, that is used in the Intercept Shield product line.
Based on the test they used, Airtite's would have performed exactly the same. I don't see much of an advantage to using the Intercept Shield "airtite" type holders. If air(oxygen/hydrogen sulfide) cannot permeate the holder, the polymer never gets to do it's job anyway. And comparing the prices, bulk Airtites are 39 cents each and the Intercept Shield 2x2's are a whopping $2.96. Bottomline, I'll stick with the cheap Airtite holders.
http://www.interceptshield.com/full..._report.html
From what I read on their website, Lucent has simply developed a polymer....it's more of just an absorbant material IMO, that is used in the Intercept Shield product line.
Based on the test they used, Airtite's would have performed exactly the same. I don't see much of an advantage to using the Intercept Shield "airtite" type holders. If air(oxygen/hydrogen sulfide) cannot permeate the holder, the polymer never gets to do it's job anyway. And comparing the prices, bulk Airtites are 39 cents each and the Intercept Shield 2x2's are a whopping $2.96. Bottomline, I'll stick with the cheap Airtite holders.
