| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 828 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4846 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3663 Posts |
Obverse MS-63, reverse MS-64, blended grade MS-63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2145 Posts |
MS63. Is that a rim Cud on lower right rim?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Thinking you guys are right, dropping to 63, maybe a plus.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4846 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18700 Posts |
typical weaker strike for this year. surface preservations is pretty good with just a few marks, scrapes and scratches here and there. there does appear to be some deeper marks on the lower left wing though. they do appear to be displacing metal so I'm not sure how a TPG would see that. anytime I see metal displacement I typically apply the details designation. due to the lighting/shadowing its difficult to determine if the luster is broken across the cheek area. I think PCGS would slab it at MS63 due to these issues
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
looks like a nice 63 to me
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
MS64. Looks dipped. A bit too bright.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
I'm in the 63 camp, but you might want to check for VAMs. It looks like the "O" is round, not oval, but need to see it to confirm. Hard to tell scratches from die breaks at this altitude!
Stay well, Diy89Nurm7
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
Easy MS-64. Pretty clean cheek.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1776 Posts |
I've seen many 64s that look worse. I would call this a 64 with a typical O mint strike.
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 828 |
|