Interesting discussion...
The reason why the winner gets no points is because they already got four more than the runner-ups and nine more than the other participants.
I wanted to make sure that someone who won multiple rounds did not build too strong a lead by having them "sit-out" the next round. It did not seem fair to give a point for hosting. In hindsight it might not have been a bad idea, but for giggles, here is what the final results would have been had that rule applied to this season:
I await other comments on this one!
As for changing the points, I want to keep it simple; but I would like to hear more comments on this as well.
The reason why the winner gets no points is because they already got four more than the runner-ups and nine more than the other participants.
I wanted to make sure that someone who won multiple rounds did not build too strong a lead by having them "sit-out" the next round. It did not seem fair to give a point for hosting. In hindsight it might not have been a bad idea, but for giggles, here is what the final results would have been had that rule applied to this season:
pls 32 COINAHOLIC 31 nohope587 31 Sir Ferrari 27 chris1222nascar 25 eaglefoot 23 trdhrdr007 23 nod2003 22 SHAFTA9a 22 DL20K 14 Parklane64 14 CoinHunter53562 13 MorganNoob 9 jayceeg 5 vermontensium 5 docsfishn 1 manilagalleontrade 1 Mike1923A 1 steve199 1 wd1040 1As you can see, pls would have been the winner; he was also the only person to win more than one round. If I change the rule for Season 4, will pls feel like he was robbed in Season 3?
I await other comments on this one!
As for changing the points, I want to keep it simple; but I would like to hear more comments on this as well.

























