| Author |
Replies: 211 / Views: 37,923 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
quote: Any particular speed I should stick with 60x, 150x, etc. and what brand (s) are best and which should be avoided?
I must qualify my reply, and my previous words, with the fact that I'm an extremist when it comes to anything concerning power and speed.  Most decent cameras have a pretty sizable internal buffer, which helps to mediate possible transfer problems with the memory card you might be using. You would have to work pretty hard at continuous exposures to approach the realistic buffer limits of a dSLR, for instance (unless you're shooting in RAW, in which case it could realistically come in to play). The "real" advantage, in most cases, of a faster card is when transferring files to the computer. I haven't found reported performance figures for the Panasonics. My Canon 350D is capable of making fullest use of the 10MB/sec speed of an 80x card. If you're using a card reader, you'll see much greater speed differences than if you're transferring by cable form the camera, but the difference between, say, an 80x and 150x card is realistically 50% in terms of time waiting for the files to move. I'm using SanDisk Ultra II cards with my Canon, rated at 80x.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
256 Posts |
Thanks Dave. I agree. From what I have read, the Sandisk 2GB Ultra II seems the right choice. Nice thing is I don't have to worry about cables or external readers, I can plug the SD card directly into my computer's multimedia slots.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Yeah, I figured it a nice compromise between price and speed, and a solid brand either way.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1026 Posts |
My new Kodak P850 takes nice coin pictures
|
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
SE-
You did well. I, as many other pros I know, have washed and dried SanDisk cards in our pockets (accident--not recommended). They still work pperfectly. Keep in mind that the FASTEST CF, SD, etc. card is not necessarily the fastest in all cameras. SOme may be the slowest. Depends on brand and model, so don't go for the hype.
You have a good, mid-road card that will serve you well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
819 Posts |
Mine sucks! I have a Sony cybershot 6.0; have yet to locate a macro function and worst of all....I HATE THE SOFTWARE! Rue the day I bought it for $199 or so. Seems like I have to delete photos I do not want while still in the camera, once uploaded to computer for a better view they are there forever. I did manage to delete on somehow but it was so complicated I just gave up. It has a "hide" function which will remove the shot from view...but it is still consuming space on my computer.
I think an equally relevant question to go along with which camera has the best features for pics is which camera has the best operating software...its a package deal; one comes with the other so try to find one that has both...a good macro and easy to use software. I guess you would have to rely on word of mouth for that. basicbob
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
Sorry you're having so much trouble with the Sony software. I have an earlier Sony Cybershot and had little trouble with the software and was able to easily arrange and manage files, including deleting them. Too bad Sony seems to have made it more difficult. I had an older version of Irfanware, and then downloaded a newer version from this site. I also have a Canon S3 IS; the software that came with it is pretty slick for some things. I'm still learning about the Canon, so can't say yeah or nay on it, yet, but my old Cybershot was good.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
Super Dave said: "...The "real" advantage, in most cases, of a faster card is when transferring files to the computer. "I haven't found reported performance figures for the Panasonics. My Canon 350D is capable of making fullest use of the 10MB/sec speed of an 80x card. If you're using a card reader, you'll see much greater speed differences than if you're transferring by cable form the camera, but the difference between, say, an 80x and 150x card is realistically 50% in terms of time waiting for the files to move." --------------------
Some "faster" cards are actually slower with certain cameras, as to writing files. Surprisingly, some of the off brand cards are faster with certain cameras. Download speed, also, is dependent on the manner of download. Downlaoding from the camera is for turtle speed. Also, I've always tried to tell people, "why put the wear and tear on the camera?" Get a $20 reader--it's faster. Some of the $40 readers are extremely fast.
Just IMPO (P for Professioanl).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
819 Posts |
I just borrowed and used a Cannon Powershot 640 and loved its performanc and quality of pics.. I still have trouble learning the initial icons for all the setttings that are available on the new digital cameras.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
834 Posts |
Dave. I can not bring up your image of the supersekrit studio can you please post it again so I can see your lighting set up ?
BRUCE.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
quote: I can not bring up your image of the supersekrit studio can you please post it again so I can see your lighting set up ?
Bruce, it'll be the same picture, coming from the same place, so if I post it again the same thing will happen. Here's the link to it - see if that works: http://www.coincommunity.org/galler...m=205&pos=48
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
834 Posts |
Dave. I guess I was asking the wrong question about the studio set up, I know some people use a box with lights around it so they can take a picture. And I know some of them paint the inside of the box white, so I guess what I want to ask is when you take a picture do you have a special little set up where you go an take your pictures ? And if so can you show a picture of how you set it up I apologize for not being able to make it more clear for you.
Bruce.
|
|
New Member
Philippines
2 Posts |
To know the good and bad points of a particular camera is to read different expert reviews and compare what the experts are saying. Most of these have pros and cons about the product of interest which was examined and tested in great detail. Some reviews may even have ratings to make for a numerical comparison with other brands. I have been doing research about digital cameras and I found a site that lists all expert reviews for different brands. I hope you can learn a lot from them that might help you make a wise selection if ever you will decide to buy a brand new unit.
***Edited by Forum Mom to remove self-promoting link. While this could be a very informative site, it is not appropriate to post here only to post a link to your site.***
|
|
Rest in Peace
 United States
2684 Posts |
Payton, that's gotta be the most useful comparative digital camera reference I've ever seen. I'm gonna post the link as a stickie.
Many thanks!
Fred
|
|
New Member
Philippines
2 Posts |
It's nice to hear I am able to be of some help in some ways. Thanks.
Edited by payton46 03/28/2007 9:03 pm
|
| |
Replies: 211 / Views: 37,923 |