| Author |
 Replies: 26 / Views: 2,612 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7174 Posts |
What, you must be wrong, NGC never makes a mistake.  It makes you wonder what it takes to get a job at NGC. My 10 year old granddaughter can see the reeds. Who knows, maybe it might be worth more as an error within an error. But I'd want it corrected. Very nice error. Edited by Cujohn
08/23/2023 5:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5780 Posts |
Hey NGC:  Still a very neat error. I'm curious why you chose NGC for this error coin? So they provided no explanation for their decision not to correct the label? I'd be tempted to go on the NGC forum, if there is one, and ask members there for an opinion. Embarrass the stew out of them for making an obvious blunder. Otherwise, I might try my luck at the PCGS forum and let them rake NGC over the coals for some satisfaction.  Words of encouragement are one of the major food groups.
We need to consume them regularly to thrive and grow.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3472 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
  United States
5674 Posts |
That's a good idea. Maybe I'll just post a question on the "Ask NGC" forum. It still bugs me that it's mislabeled, I might have to try again to get them to change it.
No reason in particular using NGC over PCGS. I just had a submission ready to go to NGC including a different coin I that I requested NCS conservation, and I figured it was a pretty straightforward attribution.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3237 Posts |
Stuff like this is why I think TPGs are only doing a disservice to the hobby (especially when it comes to errors and varieties). This is just embarrassing considering how obvious the Reeding Marks are. |
|
Moderator
United States
96842 Posts |
wow, what a Mess on that label.
I would start a topic in both NGC and PCGS forums...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts |
The coin responsible for the impression on the reverse most likely started out as a dime planchet that nestled against the collar at one pole and that received a uniface first strike. It remained behind in the striking chamber, shifted at least a little bit, and was struck into the planchet represented by your specimen. I see no reason to think it was assisted.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5619 Posts |
Edited by Morgans Dad
08/24/2023 3:09 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
96842 Posts |
as always, Mike has the best explanation of what happened.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5674 Posts |
Quote:
The coin responsible for the impression on the reverse most likely started out as a dime planchet that nestled against the collar at one pole and that received a uniface first strike. It remained behind in the striking chamber, shifted at least a little bit, and was struck into the planchet represented by your specimen. Mike, thank you for your expert analysis! So it may have been a dime or cent planchet that gained some reeding against the collar of the SBA, before leaving the reed impressions on the next strike. That would explain why there is reeding visible on only a part of the strike through area. So perhaps the NGC label is correct after all, although it would have been nice if they provided some explanation! |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2738 Posts |
Yes, it could certainly have been a cent planchet. Judging from the absolute and relative size of the impression, this would seem more likely than a dime planchet.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
| |
Replies: 26 / Views: 2,612 |
First Page
Posted 08/23/2023 5:15 pm
