| Author |
Replies: 103 / Views: 9,017 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
96802 Posts |
It didn't take much imagination to come up with that. Lets see - drop cloth on floor - Check can if paint - check toss open can of paint in air over drop cloth, throw a few paper cutout of birds in the paint - Viola - a new coin design.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
979 Posts |
I hate the obverse of the current Washington quarter. While I do not hate to reverses I do not care for them. I also hate the current Sacagawea dollar coins and the innovation dollar coins.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188952 Posts |
Quote:I also hate the current Sacagawea dollar coins and the innovation dollar coins. More for me then.  My only real gripe with them is edge lettering. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1648 Posts |
Quote:I also hate the current Sacagawea dollar coins and the innovation dollar coins. More for me then. My only real gripe with them is edge lettering. Jbuck, looks like CoinWorld (or at least howard klein) fully agrees with you. However, subsequent dollar coin issues — the Native American series of 2009 to date and the American Innovation Series of 2018 to date — also retained the use of edge inscriptions, to the detriment of the coins' appearances. The stark portrayals of Sacagawea on the Native American dollars and the Statue of Liberty on the American Innovation Dollars do not work. Without a date, Mint mark or motto E PLURIBUS UNUM, the obverses look unfinished, like cheap medals. Both series would look better with the standard inscriptions moved from the edges to the obverses. https://www.coinworld.com/news/us-c...inscriptions
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
982 Posts |
Quote:However, subsequent dollar coin issues — the Native American series of 2009 to date and the American Innovation Series of 2018 to date — also retained the use of edge inscriptions, to the detriment of the coins' appearances. Datadragon, I have seen uninformed ebay sellers offer the Wampanoag Treaty Native American dollar as being from 1621, because that's the date which is clearly shown on the Reverse.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1648 Posts |
Quote:Datadragon, I have seen uninformed ebay sellers offer the Wampanoag Treaty Native American dollar as being from 1621, because that's the date which is clearly shown on the Reverse Yes captrich! There are at least 10 even right now on ebay for the 2011 P Native American Dollar : Wampanoag Treaty 1621 Native American dollars... Some list as error such as SACAGAWEA NO DATE, 1621 Wampanoag Treaty USA Dollar Coin-VERY RARE and the below so maybe some actually think its missing the date. Some of the sellers have 100% feedback. Or maybe its more intentional as usual. There are 29,400,000 of them so probably going to see it a lot 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6535 Posts |
I thought the Susan B. Anthony coin was strange because the obverse and reverse have nothing to do with each other. Women's voting. also, moon eagle! That Finnish coin is just brutal. If you have to explain what your art means, you have seriously blown it as an artist. I have often thought that the original basic euro coins were a huge missed opportunity. Personalized countries was kinda cool, and the bi-metal coins catch the eye. But the lesser coins have utterly bland and forgettable designs with random lines and a very y2k aesthetic. I agree with people about the State Quarters. Early on, I was pumped. Soon I was bored. And then came the endless slew of different themes. Reminded me a lot of the 1980s comic books and all the different lines and "collector editions", which initially provoked a frenzy of interest, that soon faded into obscurity. Also, Wyoming! Your quarter could have been cool, guys. But it looks like a placeholder while your engraver designed a real cowboy riding a bronco. Compare that to like Connecticut, which is instantly identifiable and super memorable.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188952 Posts |
Quote: I thought the Susan B. Anthony coin was strange because the obverse and reverse have nothing to do with each other. Women's voting. also, moon eagle! A holdover reverse from the Ike. Not sure why they did it, but it was in the SBA dollar legislation. If it had not been, Gasparo could have used another eagle design he had created. http://www.smalldollars.com/dollar/page04.html
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6535 Posts |
Right, but that's a golden opportunity to make a constitutional reverse because SBA literally spearheaded the effort for a constitutional amendment. You can have an eagle on that, if you insist. But the moon? No.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188952 Posts |
I do believe an eagle was going to be used no matter what, so I have wonder if they just wanted to save time (by using an existing reverse galvano) or did they want to make sure a circulating dollar coin still had the Apollo 11 reverse for the 10th anniversary in 1979. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1648 Posts |
Quote: I do believe an eagle was going to be used no matter what, so I have wonder if they just wanted to save time (by using an existing reverse galvano) or did they want to make sure a circulating dollar coin still had the Apollo 11 reverse for the 10th anniversary in 1979. Looks like it was due to Senator Jake Gam: Chief Engraver Gasparro expected the flying eagle reverse design to be with the new Susan B. Anthony dollar, but Senator Jake Garn had other ideas. A late amendment introduced by Utah Senator Jake Garn, who was the first sitting member of Congress to fly in space, changed the legislation to keep the old Apollo 11 design from the Eisenhower dollar. Which I guess I can understand wanting to keep, especially if you've flown into space before! Although this decision ended up affecting public reception of the new dollar as many people felt the pairing just didn't make sense. (Which I would agree with)... https://coinsforsale.com/blog/the-h...anthony-coin
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188952 Posts |
Thank you for the explanation. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Quote: Also, Wyoming! Your quarter could have been cool, guys. But it looks like a placeholder while your engraver designed a real cowboy riding a bronco. Wholeheartedly agree. They literally took their license plate logo and slapped it on a quarter. The prominent designer initials make me chuckle. Whew! That was a lot of work!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6535 Posts |
Wow, I never made that connection! It really is their license plate logo, isn't it? I guess there is some historical significance to that particular graphic, but there's no reason that they couldn't have had a more realistic, cooler bucking bronco with the same outline for the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
Yes, it really is just their license plate. https://sos.wyo.gov/Services/BHRHistory.aspxThe original "BH&R" logo was designed in 1935 by Allen T. True (of Littleton, Colorado - heh-heh) and first appeared on WY license plates in 1936. Maybe the designer initials on the coin should really be ATT? Given how defensive the above link seems to be about the state's trademark of that logo, I wonder if the US Mint had to pay Wyoming to use it on the coin.
|
| |
Replies: 103 / Views: 9,017 |