We can say with certainty it is not 1492 (shame on PCGS).
Here is a (14)94 with a strong date: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=15070668
So I'm inclined to say yes.
For the record, there are often mistakes on dating the pre-1500 Pomerania coins (surprisingly, often from German houses; CNG tends to get them all right):
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=14604805 (1495)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=11168813 (1494)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=5692134 (1489)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=10288906 (1495)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4734808 (1492 retro 2)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2990041 (1495)
Here is a (14)94 with a strong date: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=15070668
So I'm inclined to say yes.
For the record, there are often mistakes on dating the pre-1500 Pomerania coins (surprisingly, often from German houses; CNG tends to get them all right):
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=14604805 (1495)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=11168813 (1494)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=5692134 (1489)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=10288906 (1495)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4734808 (1492 retro 2)
https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=2990041 (1495)
Edited by tdziemia
05/05/2026 4:20 pm
05/05/2026 4:20 pm























