| Author |
Replies: 92 / Views: 6,928 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Spain
1361 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189320 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3077 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
And one more: 1899 Eagle: Softer Focus:  Sharper Focus:    Die crack around the UNITED (Cool!) 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189320 Posts |
Very nice!  I said "Yummy!" in the grading forum, forgetting that was the grading forum and not this thread. "Yummy!" is a grade, right? 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Your collection is really coming along Moe!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
Latest addition, just got today (also posted under Classic Coins for Grading if you wish to compare your skills against Harlan J. Berk): The 1915 $10 Eagle 
Edited by Moe145 08/24/2009 5:51 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189320 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1055 Posts |
WOW Moe You are tearing through that type set! How many gold type do you have left? Love both the Eagles by the way 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1571 Posts |
Moe, thanks for taking the time to put it together! I just viewed the whole thing, and I thank you for letting me drool! I am glad I had this chance to see it. Dick
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
Edited by Moe145 08/25/2009 2:13 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
Please give me a couple of minutes to get my drooling under control.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8904 Posts |
I, myself, have rigged an intricate set of catch-basins and drain pipes to channel away my constant saliva stream... 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
Moe, I think you are going to hold the record for the fastest gold type set put together...lol.  Though your photos are excellent at showing the detail, I again have a hard time grading with them because they aren't giving a clear picture of remaining luster. Luster is probably the most important factor used for determing grade once you get above XF. Details can be strong or weak based on the strike, but the luster has a greater impact on grade because the areas of wear are easier to distinguish if the luster is broken. If the details are weak with unbroken luster, it would grade higher because the weakness is due to the strike/die state and not actual wear. Also, if the detail is very strong but completely lacking in luster, it could indicate that the coin is overdipped or clean. Could you try taking a photo with an angled light source to capture the remaining luster better? Here is a picture of my PCGS MS-61 $20 lib. Your pictures are better at showing all the details uniformly, but mine really bring out the contrast of the luster as it reflects the light. I think photos like this in addition to the ones you already posted would give us a pretty solid feel for the grade.  
Edited by johnny54321 08/25/2009 2:55 pm
|
| |
Replies: 92 / Views: 6,928 |