| Author |
Replies: 51 / Views: 39,172 |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188617 Posts |
No argument from me there. I just thought it was funny that it is almost exactly three years old. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4868 Posts |
I actually found this post searching about the satin finish on Google.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188617 Posts |
Sweet! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
I would think it would have been better to start a new thread, instead of bringing this old one up .. Because, some of the information in that post .. is not accurate. But Jbuck did correct it at the end. He is right that the satin coins only come in mint sets 2005 - 2010. The 1994 P nickel that was posted, was not a satin coin, it is a matte proof. (one of the top 100 modern coins) As for the Red Book, I have not looked up all denominations, but many of them reflect a higher value for the satin coins. If I have what you posted right, you are thinking it would be cheaper to purchase the mint sets, 2005 and up. In my experience, it would cost much more to buy the complete sets over the business strike State Quarters. Then I am not sure why you would even think about buying the satin finish coins, when you don't find them attractive. Buy what you like. For me, I like the satin finish coin over the business strikes. IMO they are higher grade coins with lower mintage.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
At first I couldn't even see the difference between regular business strike coins and satin finish coins until I put them together in an album. Here is part of my Lincoln Cent collection that shows regular strike, satin and proof coins together. Because they are all aligned you can really see how they reflect light differently. The satins are on the top, the regular in the middle and the proofs at the bottom. I for one think they're great and they make a nice addition to my collection. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
I much prefer the satin finish to the ultra cameo finish; less detail is lost in the laser etching process of the dies.
|
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
As a relative newbie, I'm going to revive this topic yet again, as it took me a while to track down this information. I recently purchased a complete P&D State Quarter set (100 coins), and a separate 2009 P&D DC and Territories set (12 coins). As I was putting them into an album, I immediately noticed that the DC and Territories set had a satin finish. The DC and Territories coins came from the Mint uncirculated sets, which I now know are different. As a completist (with just a touch of OCD), it really bothers me to have 12 satin coins in that album. :-/ So now, I have to find a non-satin set of the DC and Territories coins, then decide what to do with the 12 satin coins--put them in 2x2's, sell them, or get a complete satin set of State Quarters. I'll probably do the later. Those 12 satin coins and my OCD are going to cost me a bunch of money to build a new satin set and buy another album. Sigh...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
It seems some folks here do not consider satin finish coins to be worthy variation and not really collectable. I don't agree and have made a point of including satins along side business strike and proof coins. I have gone as far as assembling a set(as yet unfinished)of Native American dollars in satin and in A/B position for 2009 and 2010. The same could be done with President Dollars but they don't really interest me at this time, but who knows. Remember satins were only produced in Mint sets from 2005 to 2010.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
655 Posts |
Oh yeah, and BTH welcome. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
Please don't get the idea that nobody cares about satin v. non-satin! On another thread, two of us showed how we dealt with the issue. The other guy had circulation strikes in his albums so he created a set of albums for the satin coins. I did just the opposite because I collect my mint coins in mint sets and I didn't like not having the circulation-strike (non-satin) coins. The result is the same - how do you collect the "other" version of these coins? We both used Dansco Albums, but you can do it however you wish. Here is how I did it:        That's just a small image of the front of each section. You can see the whole thing, plus detailed info on how the create the pages here: http://www.larsdog.com/coins/nonsatin.htmYou can click on any image on the web site to pull up a full screen image. I didn't try to get uncirculated coins for all the slots. Quite the contrary. I looked to find as many as possible from circulation by roll hunting, but when I got bored I bought the rest from sellers that had circulation strike rolls. Happy hunting! P.S.  P.P.S. Getting a complete set of satins is as simple as buying uncirculated mints sets for 2005-2010 inclusive. You could simply keep them in the sets as is!
Edited by larsdog 02/27/2015 8:02 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
One more comment... If you do wish to simply keep intact mints sets from 2005-2010 inclusive, I like the Eagle albums. You would need 2 pages for pre-2007 Mint Sets and 8 pages for the 2007+ Mint Sets. You can see the relevant pages here: http://www.larsdog.com/coins/mint.htmThey have various binder sizes, or you can just use any 3 ring binder. You will need a 2-1/2" or 3" binder to fit everything.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
To commemorate the accession of King Edward V11 to the throne on 1902, the British Royal Mint issued matt finish proof sets Maundy Penny to Five Pounds.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1358 Posts |
I guess my strategy for this (I'm somewhat of a completist) is to collect coins from circulation for albums/binders (haven't decided yet) along with their NIFC counterparts. Then buy complete Mint sets (from 2005+) and Proof sets (1968+) to cover all finishes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4868 Posts |
I don't like the satin finish. When I had my Statehood Quarter collection, I opted for the business strikes for those years that had the satin finish.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
593 Posts |
Quote: I guess my strategy for this (I'm somewhat of a completist) is to collect coins from circulation for albums/binders (haven't decided yet) along with their NIFC counterparts. Then buy complete Mint sets (from 2005+) and Proof sets (1968+) to cover all finishes. Your plan sounds reasonable, but I think you only need Mint Sets from 2005-2010. It is my understanding that those were the only years with the satin finish on the Mint Set coins.
Edited by larsdog 03/03/2015 11:09 pm
|
| |
Replies: 51 / Views: 39,172 |