| Author |
 Replies: 24 / Views: 2,820 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5842 Posts |
Prices has gone up slightly with the higher end Mercury below 1934, some have gone up 45+% according to PCGS price chart.
I think you did real well, as in today standard, that should be at least in a 65 holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1028 Posts |
That was graded a while ago. Forget sending it to CAC. Why don't you send it to PCGS to get it regraded. With today's standards, you'll almost certainly get MS-65 FB, maybe MS-66 FB if you get really lucky. Price bump would be a lot more than either CAC sticker.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 1751 Posts |
Not if it gets a gold sticker. I collect Mercs in Rattlers and OGH slabs, so I'd never crack out a Rattler/OGH Merc. Here's an old picture, I've got more now...  Edited by FadeToBlack
10/27/2012 1:53 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5842 Posts |
Two  ! A man after my own heart. Show some close up of the other ones...any varieties or errors? |
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
I stand by my grade above....65FB. Bet this one is a gold bean.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36916 Posts |
This shows how much the grading standards have changed. That 23 is a great coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
Many coins in rattlers are a grade lower than what PCGS would give them now. This would totally go "PCGS MS65FB" nowadays, but I can't blame you for keeping it in the rattler slab  . CAC gold for "MS-64", oh heck yes! Edited by DNA
10/27/2012 10:31 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Thanks guys. Yeah, I'll have to pull my slabs and pick a dozen or so to send to CAC with the help of a dealer. Unfortunately, I don't know any collectors that would let me piggyback my coins on one of their CAC submissions.
|
| |
Replies: 24 / Views: 2,820 |
First Page
Posted 10/27/2012 1:35 pm
