Coin Community Family of Web Sites
300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads and the security checks. It's Free!

Definitive Test For Black Beauty Nickels

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 301 / Views: 80,228Next Topic
Page: of 21
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1769 Posts
 Posted Today  7H 41M ago  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OK Tropicalbats. As previously mentioned there are now three specimens in the analytical testing pool:

1. 1958-P UNC RAW BB. Acquired.
2. 1959-P UNC RAW BB. Acquired.
3. To be purchased a normal nickel looking 1958-P or 1959-P AU/UNC as a standard testing specimen.
4. TBD = A black glossy or non-glossy blue or non-blue toned Jeff 5C specimen. RAW or TPG labeled improperly annealed. Outside of the 1958 & 1959-P Jeff 5C population.

As I go through the universe based on the level of the collector on ebay so to speak I do see grayish specimens called BB's and others where the surface is NOT glossy but rough which is diagnostic of environmental damage or if outside of 1958-P & 1959-P probably just black darkened due to sulfides/chlorides ONLY and these are just environmental damage. However I think what will be VERY INSTRUCTIVE is a raw/BLACK/glossy or not glossy/near UNC or UNC black specimen not of 1958-P or 1959-P. We see two good candidates recently by CoinHI but if slabbed is the person willing to break them out for this study, retain the TPG label of course with the coin and PROCEED with the testing which again will require 1-2 mm of edge polishing. Of course with slabbed PCGS/NGC improper annealed coins not of 1958-P or 1959-P is their a blue undertone due to cobalt and if not this would be good a good candidate anyway. As we proceed forward it can be shown that all other nickels outside of the current two Philly years of 1958 & 1959 are not BB's since the Co levels are not elevated. Elevated to what level? We currently do not know. Co appears in nickel as an ore refined contaminant. But in 1958-1959 current research shows just at single digit ppm levels if not a BB type. To be determined. So having said this should narrow your field of pics submissions but a dark specimen of this period without a blue glossy tone is also a MUST IMO to report on why dozens of people now on ebay are selling BB's currently and they are not of the diagnostic glossy/blue tone appearance. JPL
Edited by colonialjohn
Today 7H 27M ago
  Previous TopicReplies: 301 / Views: 80,228Next Topic
Page: of 21

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to rattle this change. Forums