| Author |
 Replies: 51 / Views: 10,233 |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
Edited by TheCoinHunter
11/16/2017 4:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
Maybe MS 63 ,..but with worn dies..? or maybe a soft obv strike..?
...need to play with the light "in hand" on this one..
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
395 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
First thought was 55, but I'll go with 58.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
324 Posts |
wow! such a beautiful coin. tough to state a grade on this one without having it in hand due to the possible weaker strike on the obverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
It is beautiful for sure, but I'll say AU-58 as well.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
185 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
955 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1461 Posts |
I don't necessarily disagree with the cleaning comment as far as this coin goes. But this is where ICCS fails with net grading coins. Let the coin stand on eye appeal with a proper grade and comments as opposed to this nonsense.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9872 Posts |
That's just shameful, a failure of market grading, technically it's an AU coin.
Send it to PCGS, it'll come back AU details but will still fetch a better price than it will in that holder.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
Quote:
That's just shameful, I totally agree...but I'm also wondering if he also asked you if it was for sale after placing his grade on it..  |
| |
Replies: 51 / Views: 10,233 |
Posted 11/17/2017 08:11 am
