Coin Community Family of Web Sites
Like us on Facebook! Subscribe to our Youtube Channel! Check out our Twitter! Check out our Pinterest!
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some coins?
Our coin forum is completely free! Register Now!

1884-CC Morgan Dollar For Grading Opinions

Next Page | Last 15 Replies
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 467Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
United States
3831 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  8:05 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Zurie to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Here's a nice crescent toned CC Morgan dollar. I would appreciate your thoughts on grading, and also how much of a premium the toning might bring.


Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
United States
68931 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  8:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Coinfrog to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
With that cheek, I'll say MS-63.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10498 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  8:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dave700x to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree, MS63 and little to no premium for the toning unfortunately.
1883-O Nut
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
2838 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  9:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Solid MS-63, without any major issues. There is a bit of chatter on the cheek, neck, hair behind the ear, and cap below the ribbon. The reverse is better, but not enough to pull the grade up. No premium for the toning.
Pillar of the Community
United States
3624 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  9:13 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Slider23 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am at 63 with a shot at 64.
Pillar of the Community
United States
8524 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  9:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ijn1944 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very solid MS63. For lovers of subtle Morgan toning, I'd expect a very modest/modest premium.
Valued Member
United States
170 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  10:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add ericgreen to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS-63+. Neat toning, I am sure somebody might pay a few bucks more because of it.
Pillar of the Community
United States
8178 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  10:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Earle42 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I say 64 on a good day, but likely 63 from all the marks on the front.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halves
https://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
Pillar of the Community
United States
1443 Posts
 Posted 05/18/2022  11:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JasonKflo to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I could see it at 64
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
United States
4125 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2022  12:28 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ty2020b to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm at a solid MS63, possibly MS63+
Pillar of the Community
United States
4648 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2022  09:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fenton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'd say 64. Usually 63's are a bit more baggy.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1191 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2022  10:45 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Ham1947 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS63. Marked up cheek holds this coin.
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12216 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2022  11:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
the 84(CC)'s are well known for sharp strikes. this is definitely short on strike for both sides. a good amount of rub along with field abrasions and little marks here and there. the cheek and neck although not deeply scratch there are quite a bit of small dings and chatter. two dings above the eye. imo the toning will not anything to the grade nor the value. this toning typically occurs in the bag where one coin has been sitting offset on another.

MS63
Pillar of the Community
United States
4648 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2022  11:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fenton to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I should add that crescent toning is gorgeous and adds some eye appeal. Reverse is also 65 range so with the obverse at least 63+ that plus eye appeal also tilted me up to a 64 range for it.
Edited by fenton
05/19/2022 11:23 am
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1221 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2022  11:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GMS5 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I see 1884-CC VAM-4A Spiked Date, Pinned Wing Gouge.

I'll also say MS-63 , possibly a 64.
Pillar of the Community
United States
3831 Posts
 Posted 05/19/2022  12:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Zurie to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@GMS5, you're correct about the VAM-4A. Here's a better view of the pinned wing gouge on this coin.


Thanks, everyone. I was also thinking this was about a 63. The reverse toning is pretty dramatic in hand. I might list this on eBay and see if anyone is willing to pay a premium for the toning.
Edited by Zurie
05/19/2022 12:09 pm
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 467Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.





Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2022 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2022 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Powered By: