Mint Error Or Post Mint Counterfeiting?

If they're fake, they would fool me!

Bill Snyder back in 7/19/2013 here in CCF posted very similar double struck errors. My recall was Snyder had some very nice legitimate errors as some were genuine awesome world brockages but a Malaysian responder called these particular Snyder Philippine produced D/S's = bogus coins. It all comes down to a specific mint operation coming up with sufficient die press pressure where the second strike OBLITERATES the first strike - this is of course different from the 18thC and older with a conventional screwpress. This end result is possible with PARTIAL obliteration w/ screwpress D/S's. But with two coins dated 1926 & 1950. Questionable. I like that term post mint induced - rather than post mint damage <BG>. Show me another 20thC D/S with PARTIAL obliteration? It may be possible with some third world coinage mints? There interesting even if in the end being bogus. John Lorenzo - United States

The underlying feature and wear are distinct to not be mint double strike

I'm learning towards post mintage damage to make them appear like errors.