its actually the color that give me red flags first. I would steer clear because of that alone.
then there is the date. I agree that punch is wrong.
it is also missing the diagnostic die crack in the wreath under the second s in states. ive never seen an 1809 without the crack. I suppose they could exist without the crack but ive never seen it and ive been proactively looking for a while now.
100% fake. thanks for posting it!
I collect low grade large cents. I currently have >230 Sheldon varieties and >235 middle date Newcomb varieties.
there is only one variety for 1809. this aint it. the leaf positions are all wrong.
here is a nice real one
the leaf tips are in the wrong positions on the reverse. check out the location of the tip of the leaf under the F in oF and the second S and T in staTeS.
I collect low grade large cents. I currently have >230 Sheldon varieties and >235 middle date Newcomb varieties.
That date logotype is the obvious spot for me to look at first. But easy to see how these trick the innocent beginners in our hobby, this hurts us all by scaring new collectors out of the hobby entirely.
Thanks for the post Jack!
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1982, Early American Coppers Member (EAC) #6202, Colonial Coin Collectors Club (C4), Conder Token Collector Club (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS), & Numismatic Bibliomania Society (NBS) Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use