| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,093 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
183 Posts |
It appears so to me, anyone else?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2224 Posts |
IMO, it sure looks to be!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Isn't there supposed to be a "blakely" effect opposite the clip? I don't see one or am I missing it ? John1  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1807 Posts |
Existence of the Blakesley effect on a clip is a good sign it is authentic, however, its absence is not reason enough alone to call it a forgery.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5650 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Sometimes the Blakesley effect is only noticed on one side. The obverse rim looks weaker and wider about 1:00 on the coin above. Looks genuine to me. Nice find.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
With 1971 and surrounding years the rim is usually very strong and any slight weakness may be unnoticeable.
I see no problem with this one being genuine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3294 Posts |
So how do you tell someone didn't just use tin snips or a chisel on it if there is no blake effect?
|
|
Member
United States
917 Posts |
Im wondering that myself , I've a quarter here from 1948 that looks just like that , like a bit is cut off but its smooth too..
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Member
United States
917 Posts |
Thanks for that Coop , mine seems to have circulated regardless of the fault,its pretty well worn.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
986 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,093 |
|
Posted 06/23/2009 5:40 pm
