@nummisma
Yes... I like to try new things every once in awhile.


Being serious... it all in the fun. I used to teach math (and computer programming). We talked about random numbers.
Long story short, I figured since humans are pattern-bound to the core, that there was likely a "normal" random number. This also might explain how it ended up being Douglas Adam's "answer to Life the Universe and Everything" - instead of some other number.
For a few years my kids (students) and I had fun tracking specific random numbers that we also chose at random and compared how many times we encountered them compared to 42. 42 was almost always the winner


I cannot say the data was psychologically biased with so many kids and their individual degrees of desiring to see the data indicate the theory wrong/correct. Some hated the number and some thought it funny
I did get accused of changing the way they looked at the world though - they forever would be noticing the many 42s... and a lot of them still refer to this when talking with me today up to 20+ years later

I am guessing the chaos theory of math might be applied here... been on the to do list for years, just not at the top.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash?
Download and read: Grading the graders
Costly
TPG ineptitude and No FG
Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2