| Author |
Replies: 85 / Views: 9,800 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
Better pictures of my 1891 Seated Libetty dime  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Looking good. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Very nice! 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
114 Posts |
Wow, great job so far, you're starting to put together quite an impressive set.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Very nice! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6514 Posts |
You've got some beauties there. Shaping up to be an impressive Type Set.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
Thanks! It is more fun than comoleting a date and mint mark set. Had fun with my Lincoln, Jefferson, IHC, Franklin and Roosevelt dime sets. Learning about various classic coins keeps the interest up!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188213 Posts |
Looking good. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
475 Posts |
Trying to decide on a Seated Liberty quarter type coin. Similar prices from the dealers, one is an older date in AU55 and the other is a last year of the type in au58. Both have great eye appeal and strong strike. The older date has a lower mintage total. Leaning towards the older coin. Thoughts?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
6514 Posts |
I'm a fan of the older dates. That's just me.
In my 7070 if possible I try to get a coin that is the first year of issue. Unless I find a deal that I can't pass up of course.
|
| |
Replies: 85 / Views: 9,800 |