| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,154 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
I'd grade it at AU-58 but I'm guessing PCGS said MS-62 RB. Insanely nice coin  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36906 Posts |
I agree with ChildOfTheWheat, looks AU-58 to me but PCGS more than likely gave it a 62RB or 63RB
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19980 Posts |
AU
Lincoln Cent Lover!VERDI-CARE™ INVENTOR https://verdi.care/
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
I would grade it as AU58.
PCGS will market grade it to MS62RB.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
69 Posts |
no one has guessed correctly so far.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
69 Posts |
nobody guessed this one correctly, PCGS graded it MS-65 RB  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
65 will have above average luster. The picture does not tell the story. It must be a weak strike (PCGS believes)
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Rough rims and numerous hits both sides . IMHO ,PCGS dropped the ball on this one .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
Certainly does have a clean obverse field and it does look very nice, however the reverse at least in the photos, is weak with a few marks and some rubbing. Might just be the photos?
Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
18741 Posts |
although nice, I definitely would not pay MS65 price for this one
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
666 Posts |
Regarding color only, why is it not Red-Brown?
It looks RB to me, but I am a beginner, thus my question. :-)
Edited by dd27
07/31/2016 10:30 am
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,154 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 07/27/2016 4:25 pm
