| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,000 |
|
|
New Member
United States
46 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff to Add Year and/or Mintmark and/or Denomination to Title. It's essential to have it in the title. ***1887 P Morgan dollar (die clash on reverse and die cracks going all around both the reverse and obverse) This Morgan dollar is graded by PCGS MS64 in the OGH. No clue what specific VAM # is this. Please help! Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7149 Posts |
Common clash area..might be 13, would need more photos plus some with entire coin (obv n rev)
|
|
New Member
 United States
46 Posts |
Just compared my coin with VAM 13 and it does match. Thank you!
|
|
New Member
 United States
46 Posts |
What's the approx value of it?
|
|
New Member
United States
9 Posts |
That entirely depends on the Grade. Which is impossible to tell from the single photo you provided. You can use PhotoGrade on PCGS's site to approximate a grade and then see what coins of that grade brought at auction.
|
|
New Member
 United States
46 Posts |
As I stated, it's an MS64 from PCGS
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5693 Posts |
If VAM-13 is correct, that wouldn't add a premium to the coin. Full photos of the coin would help if you want opinions on the value, but recent ebay sold values for an 1887-P PCGS MS-64 are in the range of $70 to 100.
|
|
New Member
 United States
46 Posts |
How does a VAM not add premium to a coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5693 Posts |
VAMs are basically die varieties of Morgan dollars, so nearly all Morgans can be assigned a VAM. Only the most sought after VAMs (with striking features, easily recognizable, or scarcity) carry much of a premium.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
399 Posts |
I would check the date and see if this is a VAM 2.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
191235 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,000 |
|