1922 Weak D

I am not good at saying things like that ... I know online things can come out negative.
Book marking the site .. Lincoln resource center is a good thing .. I look at it often.

Also a site like this, it is good to get opinions .. but it is also good to learn how to look
things up for yourself and learn as much as you can about the coins you collect.
Opinions are not always right .. including mine.

Seeing your reverse, I do not see die markers that would make me think yours is a 1922 weak D.
Of course it is hard seeing them from a picture. The "O" on "ONE" looks normal and I can not see
a die crack. There are three different die sets that can make a weak D, each with different die markers ... is there a slight die rotation?

Please forgive my ignorance of not researching the daylights out of it before asking a question.

I guess I could take this as a negative response .. or not .. but to me doing a couple simple searches would not qualify as researching the daylights out of it.

I looked on that website and can plainly see it is not a 22 weak d . I opigize for being snippy. I was at a coin show today and was treated rather unfairly by some ppl when all I was looking for was information. Needless to say they didn't get any of the $600 I spent today.

Luvpennys I understand ... sorry you were treated badly at the coin show .. I hope you did find some coins you needed.

I hope you liked the web site .. for me it is a very good site for looking up 70 small date S, 1922 no D and other varieties.

For me the more information you have will help you, when dealing with sellers. I have been to coin shows where the sellers did not really know what 1922 they had.

So is this a 1970 small date? Okay, okay, just kidding. To me, it's one thing to prod for specific detailed info on something that could be researched independently, but another thing entirely to ask a simple opinion on something like a photo of a coin. I think this is a strength of a group like this, to have the ability to get several experienced opinions on something someone may not be comfortable with or have a lot of confidence in. And if it is something that's asked a bunch of times, so what? It must be a common issue then.

Looks like PMD.

I too agree those quick to jump on the "Use the search feature" ruin the fun and run off new members.

I too plan on leaving all of the overdate, fake mint errors, 3 1/2 stumpy leg holes open in my albums or filled with the regular version of the same year.

Looking back at this post I see some members mentioned that asking a member to do a search on the topic as negative.

I disagree.

It is not like I said .. to go search before posting... with out any other information.
My point of view is .. he is a older person .. mentioned he has a wife.
I did not just say it is not a 1922 no D ... I have seen that posted many times.

I think I asked nice ( I said please) to search online for a site Lincoln resource center.

Then gave my opinion, that I did not think it was a 22 no D.

I think in this case the member did find the site .. made the determination on what coin he has.

So now he has a good site and I feel he is be more knowledgeable about this subject.

As I mentioned before, having memebers learn about doing some research is something
we should be doing ... in addition to giving opinions.

I have quite a few sites .. and books I turn to .. not just CCF ..

and that is not to say anything negative about CCF .. just saying there is more

Not a weak D at all. Oddly enough though, at many coin shows and coin stores, I see coins that are labled as weak D, no D, etc. And there appears there are as many ideas of what a weak D is as there are dealers selling them.
They seam to go from almost full D to slightly weaker and weaker until almost gone. All depends on who is selling and who wants what.