| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 5,206 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
From 1988 to 2010, you have MS (business strike), SP and PR finishes, but not proof-like (or Numismatic BU)?
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa 03/31/2013 9:48 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
335 Posts |
Coin Games - would that be the $30 silver proof w/a mintage of 15,000?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
548 Posts |
Colour me impressed!
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
319 Posts |
@zookr no the 2007 silver loonie from wedding set, only 849 or so minted. One of my favorites is the 2007 Baby Rattle loonie.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
333 Posts |
I have been collecting most of the specimen & sterling series. Almost finish, just missing a few of the hockey coins and........2007 wedding! Thanks for the list.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
370 Posts |
Quote: From 1988 to 2010, you have MS (business strike), SP and PR finishes, but not proof-like (or Numismatic BU)? SPP, wouldn't 'proof-like' or 'Numismatic BU' be the same as MS NC (non-circulating)? Or was a different finish issued on non-circulating loon dollars between 1988 and 2010?
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
161 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
Here is one I didn't see on the list. The 2006 Lucky Loonie with a Proof finish. I believe it was only available in the bookmark.  
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
Quote: SPP, wouldn't 'proof-like' or 'Numismatic BU' be the same as MS NC (non-circulating)? Or was a different finish issued on non-circulating loon dollars between 1988 and 2010? From 1988 to 2010, yes, a different finish - they were struck in Ottawa, with mirror fields and devices. The others were struck in Winnipeg, and are just nicer versions of the normal production run. That ended in 2011, when the Winnipeg struck coins were placed into the uncirculated coin sets.... the death of the proof-like strike...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
The only problem with that 2006 proof lucky loon, is that it is encased in plastic "goop". Unlike the 2005 poppy bookmarks, those are almost impossible to get off without damaging the coin. I may try a liquid nitrogen bath, to see if that works...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
SPP> Thanks for the info. I had thought about removing mine from the bookmark to display with my other proof loons - glad I left it as is.
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
161 Posts |
This one seems missing -- the 1952-2002 commemorate with two loons at reverse. 
Edited by wandering 04/29/2013 5:39 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
370 Posts |
That is the 15th anniversary loon dollar that was issued in the annual specimen set. It is on the list.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1984 Posts |
For 1997, I think you need to add the flying loon 10th anniversary coin in regular and silver.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
370 Posts |
The silver version is larger in diameter then a regular loonie, I think the same size as a silver dollar.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 5,206 |
Page 2 of 2
|