| Author |
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,763 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
449 Posts |
I agree with the above posters. I find the toning on the second coin has much more appeal where it has developed. The first coin, it obscures the details and makes the coin look a little fuzzy almost.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
Impossible to answer, without seeing the coins in hand and seeing how the lustre plays with the light when the coin is tilted at various angles...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1554 Posts |
 I prefer the look of the 1935 dime. I love that soft satin look with the gold toning beginning around the peripherals. It also looks like a higher grade, 1 or 2 points above the 1932. I would give the 1935 an MS-64 PQ if the Obverse is similar in quality, no contact marks whatsoever on the Reverse. Glenn 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9866 Posts |
Eye appeal in hand and online can be two very different things. Based on the pics I agree with glenzy,and also like the more fully struck crown on the '35. How about some obverse pics please?
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
3234 Posts |
Here are the Obverse pics. The 35 is Graded ICCS MS 65 and the 32 is ICCS MS 64 .... back in the 90's. I prefer the frostiness myself because it somehow seems more antique and original because of the time that has passed and the fact that my preference is for silver to have at least a touch of toning. The old copper coins were lacquered by some of the early collectors,..probably knowing that copper would darken dramatically with time and therefore take away from the original visuals. I also like "Red and blazing" on copper...but... The early rare mint sets show very dark and original toned silver coins,.. and they still get a very high grading much of the time even through the darkness. So I guess that I like some toning on the silver ones. A blazer somehow looks like it's been dipped somewhere down the line...but it does also give the impression that it was struck yesterday... Thanks for your impressions and opinions here. I do listen carefully to what you say..  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
797 Posts |
#2 easily! That thing just Pops. Everyone Likes something Shiny!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1949 Posts |
I also have to say #2, just a beautiful coin...
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
99 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
293 Posts |
#2 is the one I'd like in my collection.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10460 Posts |
#1 (1935).... I do like a full strike and I prefer matte surfaces over mirror surfaces...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
Edited by SPP-Ottawa 05/28/2013 3:38 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
686 Posts |
#1 is technically a better coin, but since the question was strictly eye appeal, I'm with the majority... #2
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
306 Posts |
#2 is my favourite in the pictures but I would have to see them in hand to be sure.
|
|
New Member
Canada
32 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3167 Posts |
I agree that #1 may be the "better" coin, but the luster on the second one is too killer to ignore!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
3234 Posts |
Thanks for the input here.
My choice is the 1935 as the frostiness is complete across both surfaces, and although I'm not dealing in coins, I had never seen such a pure frosty coin like that one before and a tough date too. At the time, I'm guessing that it was graded choice or gem when I got it back in the 80's.
Blazers are always eye catching and beautiful,.. but this 35 was special to look at also. I wish that 'someday' you will see it in hand...
I know that most of us love cameos also,..but that's a whole different category...
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 2,763 |
Page 2 of 2
|