| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,231 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
4208 Posts |
Thats a fantastic idea! Unfortunately, a pauper like me cant afford gold.
Do you reckon an algorithm is possible? Someone with a set of calipres could measure their coin accurately, input the numbers (diameter, thickness) and purity (hopefully known for the coin and what the gold is alloyed with) and let the algorithm work out the recquired tone. Check it via the microphone to get a yes/no on authenticity.
Or, even developing it further, work out the purity of a coin based on its tone (perhaps not possible due to different alloying). A bit more work would allow someone to get a set of purity ratings - content of gold when alloyed with different metals.
But I know nothing of this, perhaps its not possible to do such a thing. I'm sure the shape of the coins surface has some effect, no matter how small, on the tone.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
807 Posts |
Certainly the speed of sound varies in various alloys, so it should be entirely possible to differentiate them by acoustic signature. The best test would probably use a transducer to generate a known acoustic signal, rather than dropping the coin (from a height which is not calibrated to deliver a specific amount of energy) onto a surface of unknown properties. This would also help to reduce the confusion generated by coins with lamination or inclusion errors, which can 'sound wrong' despite being of proper weight & composition.
|
|
New Member
 Belgium
10 Posts |
@BenByfield: That would be possible. The problem is, however, that for small variations in alloys the material parameters that govern the acoustic fingerprint can vary. So the estimation would work best for alloys/materials that are well characterized, such as pure gold/silver.
What seems more logical, in my mind, would be having you create your own database of pings for whatever coin you have, and compare that with others. That way you could compare the composition of your coin with other people, if you both take the time to ping your coin. That's currently not a feature, but would that be useful?
|
|
New Member
 Belgium
10 Posts |
@publius: The standard ping test works just fine. Just balancing the coin on your finger and tapping it slightly with a hard plastic pen for instance.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189969 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 Belgium
10 Posts |
Wow, I'd love to get in touch with wert about that. Right now we're supporting three bullion coins. But this could definitely be interesting for all types of coins. What do you think?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189969 Posts |
Hopefully he will see this thread. I posted a link to this in the other one to get his attention (if he subscribed to it, he will get an e-mail). 
|
|
New Member
 Belgium
10 Posts |
Thanks :)
Thing is, I know almost nothing about numismatics. But the core principle on which the technology works should apply to all coins. I would love to hear what some real numismatists would deem useful.
|
|
New Member
United States
25 Posts |
I'd really be interested in hearing how you did this. Do you FFT the recording and search for harmonics at expected locations (within a minor threshold of frequency of course), and match that against some known profiles?
Do you feel comfortable sharing your code?
|
|
New Member
 Belgium
10 Posts |
Hey NCSU,
Thanks for your interest. What you're describing was more or less our first approach. The problem, however, is that pinging a coin usually only excites 2 to 3 harmonics. Particularly in the case of 2 harmonics, there can be overlap between different coins. So although simple thresholds for the harmonics would give you a decent sensitivity (true positive rate), it would also involve a significant false positive rate.
For instance, purely on harmonics, the krugerrand and the maple leaf match up rather nicely. Which would require you to delve deeper. More specifically one needs to harness the information in amplitude, frequency and time domain.
I can answer your questions on specifics, but I'm sure you understand we'd like to keep our code, ours.
But in terms of questions, by all means, shoot away.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
337 Posts |
This begs the question, "How do the 'Cash for Coins' shops determine the composition of a coin?" Do they use a device that determines the gold/silver content? Would your idea be able to spot counterfeits?
|
|
New Member
 Belgium
10 Posts |
@FinanceGuru
Yes! That's the point :). They could use a laptop, or this technology could be ported to a smart phone.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
I use the acoustic method all the time for coins submitted to The Black Cabinet. Freeware programs like Audacity and a few others currently support the waveform analysis charts necessary to track harmonics and resonance, but when dealing with coins that have a certain amount of wear or patina on them, things need to be adjusted on the fly.
If this is something that can be distilled down to a smartphone, that would be useful.
|
|
New Member
 Belgium
10 Posts |
What is the black cabinet? And out of curiosity, do you keep a record of resonance frequencies for various coins? If so, what type of coins?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1796 Posts |
The link to The Black Cabinet's in my signature. It's a growing collection and database of counterfeit American coins that are currently in circulation (either among collectors and dealers or as current money).
I don't have any frequencies and maps recorded for posterity. I more often than not test genuine pieces of similar wear side-by-side with submissions and compare fingerprints when other details are inconclusive. The bulk of what crosses my desk are silver dollars, but over the course of an average year I tend to see fake gold pieces, pennies, and halves, too. Just last month I had a fairly convincing St. Gaudens $20 fake, but the weight was so light that I didn't need to check it for resonance to confirm. :-)
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 3,231 |
Page 2 of 2
|