| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 2,827 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
160 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5890 Posts |
MS-63
Please provide grade when notify. Thanks!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
I'm going to say 3. Nice coin, rare coin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Lovely. I'm guessing the vertical scratch behind the eye is less-prominent than the image suggests - that's typical of direct-lighting digital photography - and assign an NGC grade of MS64. There aren't a whole lot of these in any higher grade, and 66 is Top Pop for 1928, which is why I'm not really entertaining 65 as a possibility even with the tremendous fields and reverse. Probably about a $1000 coin, if it made 64.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Looks like a very nice 62. I wonder if NGC thought it was a tad over-dipped and knocked it down a point. I did read your grade comments but still would have thought 63 unless something else was noted.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4337 Posts |
that's way more luster than my one Peace dollar which is a PCGS MS62. I would have thought this coin went a few tics higher. nice coin though |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1002 Posts |
Quote:
Looks like a very nice 62. I wonder if NGC thought it was a tad over-dipped and knocked it down a point. I did read your grade comments but still would have thought 63 unless something else was noted. Hmmm I can see from the pics how she might appear dipped, but in hand it is clearly not, has original lusterous skin. I think the scratch and brow marks were the the deciding factor. Edited to add - She is a beauty for a 62, no doubt about it. Edited by Night-Hawk
11/04/2013 4:45 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
I can see why it was considered a 2, but I'd be tempted to crack and resub if it looks like that in hand.
|
|
Moderator
United States
23522 Posts |
They hit you hard for that scratch, which is more prominent than I suspected. For that matter, I wonder why it didn't become a Details coin, if it's so bad to warrant grade-point reduction. This is a very curious grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
That's what makes grading so interesting to me.. Curious how PCGS would grade it.. Edited to add - This is one of those coins you could submit 3 times and get three different grades.  Edited by Night-Hawk
11/04/2013 6:27 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5890 Posts |
I thought a MS-63 would be a fair grade, maybe a re-submission to PCGS is in order?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8904 Posts |
Quote:
This one I'm keeping for sentimental reasons, a favorite. That's good reason for keeping it! (I can think of another 1,000 reasons as well!)  |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,827 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/03/2013 9:09 pm
