| Author |
Replies: 32 / Views: 4,097 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
136 Posts |
For a coin that is over 100 years old one has to assume that in the condition that its in it, someone probably preserved it in some way to make it look more appealing maybe it was dipped a couple of years ago or some other method was used...
I personally like to preserve my coins in a non damaging way, and many times I found that a lot of whear was hidden by dirt or tarnish, if you go ahead and preserve a coin with underlying damage, then those old "wounds" might appear rather fresh again...
I have handled fakes high end and not so good ones and I agree most of them have been rubbed to make their surface look more flawed but in those cases it was always a lot of damage...
one or 2 scratches here and there they can come from anything...
Ill have the swiss coin certified and let the pros take a look at it if its fake they would have to look at the method used to strike it and see if its contemporary to how those where struck during that time... That would be a more definite evidence to declare such a piece as fake...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
136 Posts |
But back to the topic... Counterfeits are a big issue and a lot of people fall for it you just have to go on ebay and look around a bit... So I stumbled upon this one here yesterday  its a 3 silver scudi from malta a FAO coin The left one is a fake and the right one is genuine. On the left the coin shows inferior striking, although I think its still pretty good, the method used to strike it would have been with a transfer die... Upon closer examination you can see that the real fine details are sort of muddy.... I think an average person wouldnt doubt this coin and would only look for it being a fake if someone told him, which makes those really dangerous...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
I'm not seeing any problem with the coin on the left. Perhaps some of the details are not as high relief, but that in not unusual. That can simply be the difference between a coin struck from a fresh die and one that had seen some use and possibly been refurbished. Still much better looking that a transfer die.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
136 Posts |
How about this one ? 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
It looks mostly good, but a little weird. I think it may kind of like the fake Chinese Panda coins that have been on the market for some time. The genuine examples of this coin don't usually have such deep mirror-like fields as this coin does.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2124 Posts |
Maybe the solution is to grade all coins, so we'll buy only graded coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
856 Posts |
Quote: Maybe the solution is to grade all coins, so we'll buy only graded coins. If you mean TPGC graded, they have been fooled by such things. And of course, there are now fake slabs .. .. all we can do I suspect is to educate ourselves. However that is no guaranteed protection. I feel fairly knowledgeable about the series I collect but I nearly bought a replica. The only thing that stopped me was I realised that my friend still had the self-same coin for sale on his website. Turns out he has the original from which the copies were made! Of course fools in search of a bargain don't help. This week I have seen three modern copies for sale on ebay. All the sort of thing you can buy as souvenirs at museums or stately homes and marked as such by the manufacturers! I flagged them to ebay but .. nothing. In fact one sold for over £150. Most frustrating!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
Tom, are you using the standard method of reporting the fakes or the more direct one? The direct link is on this forum: http://contact.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAP...lling+Coins+I have had great success getting fakes removed off ebay using that method. I believe that once the watchdog community gets to know you things get expedited.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
856 Posts |
Quote:Tom, are you using the standard method of reporting the fakes or the more direct one? The direct link is on this forum: http://contact.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAP...lling+Coins+I have had great success getting fakes removed off ebay using that method. I believe that once the watchdog community gets to know you things get expedited. Thanks Numismat. I used the link, so we'll see what happens!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5362 Posts |
atticguy You say you collect Jefferson nickels to avoid counterfeits. That is very interesting. 53 years ago back in 1960 as a 13 year old kid I found a 1944 Jefferson nickel in change I was looking through. That 1944 nickel did not have the P above Monticello. It was a Francis Henning Counterfeit. It started me on what is now a 53 year long career collecting counterfeit coins. Odd how a Jefferson nickel started me collecting fakes and Jefferson nickels are your way of avoiding them. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
686 Posts |
GEKO, the first 3 scudi, the one on the left, I can see problems with the hair and the way the flag attaches to the pole. But had you not pointed it out as fake, I would have missed the points. As to the third 3 scudi posted, I think it is genuine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1666 Posts |
Westwood, it's just the way it's photographed that makes the details harder to see, pretty clearly a lower contrast photo than the others. The third one looks a little too mirror-like, but in all honesty I have no doubts that all three are genuine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2805 Posts |
It's from the Order of Malta, not Malta. :U
|
|
Valued Member
United States
136 Posts |
Quote: It's from the Order of Malta, not Malta. :U I have some proof issues from the aehmm.. order of malta :) and I must say that especially the last one that I showed is very very poorly struck if I compare it with the ones I own its not the same coin but another issue. Its not just the photography, if the quality of the strike was good enough you would see a nice cameo. Of course one might say oh its probably a worn die or something... Its up for debate if those coins where struck with quality control.... One thing I believe is that counterfeits should not be underestimated and they are getting better every day. So we can just speculate... Soon ill be getting one of these and ill be uploading some good pictures to compare..
|
|
Valued Member
United States
136 Posts |
Quote: Westwood, it's just the way it's photographed that makes the details harder to see, pretty clearly a lower contrast photo than the others. The third one looks a little too mirror-like, but in all honesty I have no doubts that all three are genuine. I want to note that if you take a close look you will see that there is a big difference in how well the coin was struck and its not because of the contrast of the picture. Concerning the 3rd scudi the details seem a bit better however in this case the cameo is.... well...
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 32 / Views: 4,097 |
Page 3 of 3
|