| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,773 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Man, you've got some nice 1921's. This one's a little weaker strike - slight flattening of the talons and incomplete large bottom leaves on the wreath - but still strong. I see it as a good strong 64. Shot in sunlight?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
Shot with two Jansjo LED desk lamps and a daylight desk lamp.
I'll try to get up some lighter pictures.
There is a scratch on the right wing that doesn't show up well when looking at it straight on.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Solid 64. Try diffusing the light out of those Jansjo's and see if that helps. Shame about the milk shots.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
64. Nice reflective surfaces
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'm still comfortable with 64. If that was shot with Jansjos, they're probably at too low an angle; that's why I thought it was sunlight.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
110 Posts |
I put this in 64 territory as well.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
The jansjos were at a low angle. I used super-macro so the lens was about 2" away. It was the only way to get the light in without a shadow.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Ooooh. Hello, massive increase in contrast.  Quote: The jansjos were at a low angle. I used super-macro so the lens was about 2" away. It was the only way to get the light in without a shadow.
Gotcha; you're doing the best you can with what you've got. Remember the technique with your last set, because it's as good as you could hope for with lustrous silver. I really, really like it; the only downside is I can see two different lighting color temperatures in it.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
93 Posts |
If your not sick of this thread by now... These are the sellers pictures. These are the only thing I had to go by. Scanned, I'm guessing, through the plastic case it came in.  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Yeah, scans. Your hints that there might be a pretty good coin here (posted more for lurking readers than yourself):
1) Mint wash spots. These wear off quickly in circulation, and are a pretty good indicator the coin is Mint State.
2) Details in the talons and along the top edges of the wings indicate a strong strike.
3) Especially on the reverse, "dark" fields shown in a scan indicate pretty darn good luster.
4) You just_don't_see that much detail in 1921 cotton bolls very often.
The coin you presented here in photographs backs up everything the scans hinted at.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,773 |
Page 2 of 2
|