| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 3,121 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
 but better pics could show me wrong. Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts |
I see something. Unfortunately I don't think you are going to get an informed opinion with the resolution you have on your coin. I agree that it appears that something is there. What it is I can not say.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
It should look like this:  Edited by jcuve
01/02/2014 4:50 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
282 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
please, guys those pictures on that bad. should be enough to know!
somebody get on my side. the last few days looking at it over and over again closely pictures cross check pictures for the date the 6 is perfect bass is as the truss and libertiesypread to the right is all the right places. It has to be it has all y attributes
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
Jcuve, it does look exactly like those pics. I know that the latest PicS I posted r much better then before . Spread on the 1& 9 plus the 3 is just like the number one. And the 3 doesn't have as much spread as number 2 does. then there is the 6, it is perfect as the 6's and all the pics at coppercoins & coinfacts. I d check to cross check it over and over with xxxcherrypickers.
please I hope you take another look and closer look and that date and confirm this I'm sticking to my guns on this one.
I apologize for my last reply I accidentally pressed reply before I finish
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
It doesn't look like DDO-001 or 002 from the pics. Have you checked 003? 001 in an uncirculated grade pops. It's a really a nice doubled die.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
844 Posts |
Looking at your close-up of your date, it does appear to resemble the one that jcuve posted.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
I'm getting older and my eyes aren't as good as they used to be - but even zooming the page to 250%, I can't see doubling. Do you have a different camera? Are these the original size of the images or did you size them down?
|
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
I zoomed into the second whole coin shot and I don't see any of the characteristic doubling or diagnostics for DDOs 001, 002 or 003.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2624 Posts |
I would like to see better,clearer close up photos of date, "LIBERTY" and "IN GOD".
I see something on the 1 and 6 of the date but I am sure it is not the 001.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1054 Posts |
I'll say it's definitely not DDO #2, no broken leg "R" in Liberty. And I'm not seeing the doubling to indicate it would be DDO #1. |
|
Valued Member
United States
142 Posts |
Sometimes photos can be deceiving, but being I have attributed all the big DDOs from 1936 I am reasonably confident it is not any of them. As noted, all three have a broken T hub in LIBERTY which yours does not seem to show. (001 had the broken T first hubbing and is obscured.) I am attaching a large collage of DDOs 001-004. DDO-004 is 1DO-010 on coppercoins.com and does not have a broken T. 001 & 004 courtesy J Amato, 002 LDS & 003 Watersport collection. Maybe this helps...  Edited by jcuve
01/03/2014 1:16 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
282 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8520 Posts |
Joey you should invest in a good cheap USB microscope.
Oregon coin geek.....*** GO BEAVS ! ! ! ***
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 3,121 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 01/02/2014 4:45 pm
