| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 4,347 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5172 Posts |
I believe they're talking about the years since that mint became proof-only, but then they're at least seven years early (even if we ignore the rumored non-proof ATB Quarters - the Coin Facts section on this site says there aren't any, but I distinctly remember them being discussed - there are the 1980-S and 1981-S SBA dollars). |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1911 Posts |
I definitely would not mind a reverse proof set :D
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Where did you find the information about the March of Dimes Dollar/Dime? Does it say whether any of the proceeds will benefit the March of Dimes Foundation? If so, I will get a several sets to assist their worthy cause.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
269 Posts |
January1May: rumoured non-proof ATB S mint quarters? Not rumoured. They have been making them since 2012 for collectors shipped from the mint in rolls and bags. I have the 2012 and 2013, and will be buying the 2014 once the last one is issued. |
|
New Member
United States
28 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
A reverse proof set would be interesting.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5195 Posts |
Reverse proof set  |
|
Valued Member
United States
291 Posts |
I would buy a reverse proof set.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4867 Posts |
Am I the only one not really excited about this? It is just mind boggling to me. If they're going to do this they should wait until the ATB Quarters have concluded. Now there would be all these new finishes with the remaining quarters and the previous ATB Quarters would not have the new finishes. And it was stupid to introduce "S" mint business strikes after the ATB had already been running. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!! |
|
Valued Member
United States
64 Posts |
I would not buy a reverse proof set. If the US Mint does that, they are going the way of the Canadian mint. Too many product. I and others collectors can not buy them and would simply lose interest.
What is next, a curved proof set?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2077 Posts |
100th anniversary of the Mercury dime doesn't make sense. It hasn't been in production for 100 years. Applying the same logic, they could have mod25 anniversaries for coins almost every year. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
814 Posts |
Quote:
What is next, a curved proof set?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1208 Posts |
Another silver coin remade in gold?!?
This is getting stupid.
They need to bring back the Merc dime, for at least the one year...
Not act like carnies with a coin squisher.
(As in modifying coins in novel, but stupid ways...
Just that they happen to have unlimited funds, so pure gold it is. :smh: )
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1208 Posts |
If the mint thought they could make a buck holing coins, they would.
And instead of QVC gold plated coins, they just make them pure gold.
Why? Because they can. It's not for collectors, it's for revenue.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4211 Posts |
A reverse proof silver dime... I like that idea~!
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 4,347 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 10/23/2014 2:43 pm
