| Author |
 Replies: 21 / Views: 1,921 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
My first thought was MS 67, but chance at PL by the looks of it. Hard to say with that date/MM as they tend to look spectacular even when not PL (a lot of semi-PLs, +. I would guess 67? Nice coin nonetheless ;)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree 66PL, very possibly 67. Fantastic coin!
Edited by Coinfrog
11/05/2015 3:49 pm
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
There is that one hit on the reverse that may limit the grade...
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
I'd guess 7pl, but it's tough to tell what is going on with the lower cheek.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
MS66. Gorgeous Morgan!  Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
66, maybe 67, but not PL.
There is obvious cameo in the design which is sharply struck, but
these excellent pictures show the radial mint lustre, which has tiny ridges (flow lines).
With fresh dies, the fields would be much smoother.
They don't come much better than this one!
Edited by sel_69l
11/05/2015 11:53 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 Norway
148 Posts |
It's good to see that I'm getting closer to my goal of almost the equal quality of the Trueview pictures.
as for the coin it was (!!) slabbed MS67PL, however here in Norway it's a common practise to remove coins from their slab. I do however have the orginal grade, and pictures of the coin in the slab.
If I were to reslab the coin, and send the orginal pictures and slab ID, will it still get the same grade?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Thats a grade I wouldnt remove, the slightest little tick removing it and you could easily lose a grade or just from shipping ticks
Edited by basebal21
11/06/2015 05:32 am
|
|
Valued Member
Norway
148 Posts |
I wouldn't remove it either, but the previous owner did..
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
To answer you question though it may if it didn't damaged at all in the process. I wouldn't waste time sending pictures as they wont care it'll be graded brand new with no regards to the past. In that grade though I would send the label to get it removed from the population report and try and keep that more accurate
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
Looks like this one could make MS67 PL. Very nice
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 1,921 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 11/05/2015 3:49 pm
