| Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,142 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2797 Posts |
bcow527,
You could do this community a service by listing the slabbers and providing pictures of the coins if possible. It won't help you recoup your losses, but it may allow others to avoid the same predicament.
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
They were all MS, and when I get the coins back I will post them.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Sorry to hear...I would be surprised as well. As much as I dislike cleaned coins, I think it's rather sad how obsessed the TPGs have gotten about this. Certainly cleaned coins that have a damaged surface have lost value, but less intrusive cleaning has been "body bagged" as well. The truth is that many coins approaching the century mark (or younger) were cleaned in their past to varying degrees by well-meaning collectors. Now the TPGs are effectively stigmatizing any cleaned coin...does anybody else see a problem here?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
Can you imagine owning a classic Ferrari or Corvette and the value decreased because it was previously cleaned ? 
Edited by 1sikevo 01/23/2008 4:18 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
quote: ...imagine owning a classic Ferrari or Corvette and the value decreased because it was previously cleaned?
Lol...right!  Those cars are re-lacquered and re-upolstered to sell into the stratosphere (although original parts mean a lot). As for collectors of anything, they need to know what they're buying. I'm concerned that slabbing is becoming the defining mark of a quality coin, where the buyer/investor doesn't really need to know anything: close your eyes and buy that slab! Personally, I think that's a fallacy that will be disproven in time.
Edited by KurtS 01/23/2008 5:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
KurtS, as collectors we should be able to see previous cleanings ourselves. To me, as with many others, originality is a must and any type of cleaning (and I include dipping) destroys this originality. I applaud the TPG's who refuse to put these coins in holders (anacs will, with the problem noted on the slab). Remember, it's not just the grade that is being guaranteed but the originality as well.......if bcow527 had bought his coins slabbed by one of the big 3, he wouldn't have started this thread.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5318 Posts |
Hadley, I have no argument with your points. I am particularly averse to any cleaning that harms the original minted surface, MS or otherwise. I should elaborate further to state the cleaning I'm referring to is that which merely removes dirt without harming the coin's surface to any visible degree--other than possibly revealing underlying mint luster. Otherwise, I totally applaud that TPGs root out dishonest coins. I think the current high premiums over minute grading differences has contributed to this problem.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
I don't like how you get blindsided and lose your whole fee for getting the coin BB'd. At 30 bucks apiece, not including shipping and insurance, that really adds up. I just sent 5 coins off to ANACS today for that reason. If it's been cleaned in the past, then authenticate and state it, don't just take my money and send the coin back with a sticker.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
ICG has a bit of a different BB policy as well. If a coin is rejected, they list the reason for rejection and apply the grading fee toward a future submission, less $5 for handling fees. http://www.icgcoin.com/Default.aspx?tabid=655ANACS and NCS are the only two that will slab a problem coin though. I personally do not have a problem with cleaned coins as it can be hard to avoid in some early series and I even have a few in my collection. I would never clean a coin but I do conservation work every once in a while. If the cleaning is done gently the eye appeal is not harmed too much especially if it has retoned in an album, kraft envelope or some other natural method. I just have a problem with the ones that someone scrubbed with steel wool, those are just plain ruined 
|
|
New Member
 United States
17 Posts |
hadleydog, ".......if bcow527 had bought his coins slabbed by one of the big 3, he wouldn't have started this thread. I started the the tread to see if I could get some feedback on the situation, not to hear the obvious! That is why I sent them into PCGS in the first place....to get slabbed by the "Big One". Using your logic....no one should buy a coin unless it has been slabbed from one of the big three. I am not talking about grading differences, I am talking about fraud...I expected the grade to be lower, but not that three different grading companies would actually grade a cleaned coin, and before you ask...I had a local dealer look at them before I submitted them, and without breaking them out of the current slab, he thought they were good to send in to PCGS.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
quote: I am talking about fraud...I expected the grade to be lower, but not that three different grading companies would actually grade a cleaned coin
That is the crux of the situation- most "third party grading companies" are not a company at all but some guy putting together CoinWorld slabs in his momma's basement and making the labels on an inkjet printer. That generally means that "slabbing" is someone's way of getting rid of their cleaned, altered, and damaged coins at higher-than-market prices. The only reputable companies that actually take public submissions are PCGS, NGC, ANACS, ICG, PCI(future uncertain at this time) and SEGS. I believe that ICCS would also fall into this category but they are for Canadian coins. Any other jumble of letters is a sham outfit. If the company does not do public submissions, have a physical street address(not a PO Box), or is not listed with the FTC and the BBB, then they are not a true TPG and since it is just a "guy in momma's basement", good luck on finding anyone to prosecute for fraud 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
bcow527 - Just out of curiosity, what company slabbed these coins originally ?
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
I bought a coin that is lightly cleaned 1884 S Morgan looks to be a MS 63, really great price but I would never be able to tell it was cleaned by looking at it, how do you tell?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1130 Posts |
quote: I would never be able to tell it was cleaned by looking at it, how do you tell?
something off witht the original luster, micro hairlines, the accumulation of dirt in recessed areas, etc.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
quote: I bought a coin that is lightly cleaned 1884 S Morgan looks to be a MS 63
Welcome, I hate to be the bearer of bad news but if it was cleaned the highest mint state grade a coin can achieve is MS60. I seriously doubt that your coin is even that high. Why do I say that? 1884-S is what is known as a "conditional rarity" coin. An uncleaned, undamaged MS63 1884-S Morgan is a $30,000+ coin  due to the fact that very few survive in AU-MS grades. Can you post a picture of it? I would be interested in seeing your coin but it is doubtful that it would grade very high at all, even a solid AU coin is worth hundreds of dollars. With a picture, we could give you some indicators for the cleaning and give an estimated grade.
Edited by biokemist6 01/24/2008 6:23 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,142 |
Page 2 of 2
|