| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,172 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
MS-62 I love that reverse. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree 62, but most attractive.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
61+ if that exists, but the toning on the reverse and those die cracks make this coin a winner any day!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18717 Posts |
Nice reverse and color. Obverse will hold it to MS62 though
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
M<S-63 detail, but with all the marks and scratches MS-60.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I see wear; slider AU58, nicely toned.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
62, but as has been true of several that you've posted, tasty toning.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Close to textbook MS-62. Has the luster and eye appeal of a 63 but is just too baggy. The MS-60 and MS-61 grades in my experience tend to be used for coins that are uncirculated but have very impaired luster or coins that are just excessively bag marked all over. This one has a lot of bagmarks but they aren't at a level that is unsightly and the luster is all there. Plus it has nice toning which can push a grader on the fence between 61 and 62 to knock it up to the 62 level.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5193 Posts |
thanks dave700x for your help.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
My pleasure. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
637 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,172 |
Page 2 of 2
|