| Author |
 Replies: 19 / Views: 2,002 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
AU-50. Take out of 2x2 and get clearer pics.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
175 Posts |
Rim knock is gonna get you. Nice coin overall!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-55. Agree rim hit will probably be an issue.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
AU-53. I'm not certain if that rim ding will be enough to detail grade it. Better photos would help us with our opinions.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Do yourself a favor and flatten those staples.   |
|
Valued Member
 United States
338 Posts |
Thanks for the replies. Still gotta work on the photos.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
I'll say AU-50 mostly due to the rim hit. Absent that, would be AU-55.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
Thanks for the replies. Haven't had a chance to produce better picts yet.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
121 Posts |
To me all the obverse high points look worn enough for XF-45 to AU-50 at best.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
Trying for better pict   |
|
Valued Member
United States
70 Posts |
Based on these pics I would say its more like XF or even F Details with the hairlines across the face.
Sorry for the edit I posted based on original pics then these were posted right before I posted.
Edited by jamiep
02/26/2016 08:19 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
The newest pictures are much better, but they are of the wrong coin. The first coin is dated 1878, while the second coin is dated 1879.
As for the 1879 coin, which appears more worn than the first: it looks to be F-15, and possibly Cleaned.
Edited by Joseph7420
02/26/2016 10:54 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
338 Posts |
Yikes, thanks for the catch on date.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,002 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 02/21/2016 1:30 pm
