| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,648 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1192 Posts |
My first thought was 64 red. Something about just doesn't "pop" enough for 65, IMO. One of those coins that the images/seeing it hand make all the difference.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
Different lighting with flash.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
I just realized I posted these in the wrong forum. Sorry about that.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9874 Posts |
64 RD
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Very nice..  MS-64RD
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
840 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5596 Posts |
I'd say 63 RD .. too many marks for 64.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
If it's a new cert I don't see why it wouldn't be a 65 red so I'll say 65 red
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1049 Posts |
66RD, slight chance of hitting south to a 65RD, blemishes seen could have been caused by rusting on the die.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2187 Posts |
Again, great coin! I had a 1901 MS65RD that had a similar look. Much better in hands than in photos. I can imagine how nice this 1896 looks in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
Yes...I need to do something about my photography skills. The coin looks great in hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
I think your pics are great, Through plastic and you take them where it's easy to understand the surface of a coin, always really like your pics!
Lovely coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I think Canada deserves something better than ICCS, but I don't see it happening. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
1461 Posts |
Thanks Alan, It's always a struggle when listing coins of how good to make the coin look vs how much imperfection to show that's not normally seen by the naked eye (or even with some magnification) to truly reflect the state of the coin.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,648 |
Page 2 of 2
|