| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,046 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
I used my phone for this and I typically avoid using the flash. In this case, no flash, overhead CFL Daylight lighting and no editing other than cropping.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
For me , this is a problem coin .F-15/VF-20 Details cleaned. and unsightly scratches .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
VF details. Cleaned from those pictures.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
VF details, cleaned, scratched.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Value - maybe a few bucks at best.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
 with the above |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12477 Posts |
Thanks everyone for your input. I'm still trying to get a handle on the Details part.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1963 Posts |
Yeah, I was just curious about the flash because sometimes using bright flash can make a coin look cleaned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
VF details with some cleaning and minor corrosion. Unfortunately the coin is not worth much. The 1883 No Cents Nickel was saved in quantity, and AUs and even Mint State pieces are very common.
The coin does bring a premium in Proof because it's a one year type with a resulting limited mintage.
|
|
Moderator
United States
15531 Posts |
Late to the grading party ... but offer my concurrence with the majority opinions. The significant scratch on the reverse is enough IMHO to relegate this coin to 'details' status ... yet alone the likely cleaning. Quote:
I'm still trying to get a handle on the Details part. The concept is not that tough ... any level of significant damage to the coin other than honest circulation wear is subject to a 'details' verdict ... cleaning, graffiti, rim bruises, big scratches, etc. The application of the concept is where many of us have an issue ... mostly on old cleaning. Is it bad enough to render a 'details' verdict? Thats where experience comes into play. Your coin is a no-brainer VF state 'details' coin. David |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,046 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 12/12/2016 07:50 am
