| Author |
 Replies: 31 / Views: 4,110 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree. Just don't completely buy the "polishing lines" statement - polishing lines aren't usually at sharp angles as here. Even if so, they're still a distraction.  Edited by Coinfrog
05/14/2017 6:53 pm
|
|
Valued Member
United States
384 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21788 Posts |
A few minor hairlines in the fields, perhaps a few more on the raised features of the design, more obvious on the obverse.
With a silver coin in this high condition, the edge milling should have sharp, almost cutting feeling to it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Too amny hairlines for a PF-65, and not enough constrast for CAM. PF-64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
2936 Posts |
Came back PR-62. Horrible grade possibly as a "reply" to its not being sent in Express due to potential value. It's at NGC now under "Express" for another opinion. I saw NOTHING that would have put it below a 64. Let's see what happens this time in the basket. PG
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
Crap, I'm sorry, I just read your update. Unless I'm missing something on the photos, that looks like a 65 to me. Were there any rim dings?
Edited by MikeF
07/11/2017 10:23 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
could you point out what's definitely a die scratch and what's actually a flaw/ real hairline? cause if the long thing behind Liberty is a die scratch, PR-62 isn't a proper grade, but if it's a hairline on the coin, it fits the bill for the current PCGS grade. did you get true views for the coin?
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1944 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Taiwan
606 Posts |
Ouch. That old Fatty holder is looking pretty good right now. Keep us posted and good luck.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
Quote:
if it's a hairline on the coin, it fits the bill for the current PCGS grade. did you get true views for the coin That line is a polishing line. It's an outie instead of an innie..  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
Grade back from NGC: 001 1878 20C PF 64  Whew!! Somebody throw a rock at PCGS for me.  |
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
Quote:
Somebody throw a rock at PCGS for me I would like to throw rocks at all the TPGs. Congrats! I know that was bit of a scare. |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2936 Posts |
Welp, here she is - back from the cleaners erm graders....  and another thang --- NGC correctly attributed my 1840-O Half Eagle as "Large Diameter (Broad Mill)" while a) PCGS won't attribute that variety although it is discussed at length in their "Coin Facts" area; and b) ANACS refused to designate it as such although it was originally broken out of a 1st generation ANACS holder WITH the Broad Mill designation. Love me some TPG's these days.... PG |
|
Valued Member
United States
50 Posts |
THATS BEAUTIFUL!  |
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 31 / Views: 4,110 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 07/08/2017 01:26 am
