| Author |
 Replies: 36 / Views: 5,765 |
Page 3 of 3
|
|
|
|
New Member
 Spain
18 Posts |
I could read Philip V, and value at the right of coat of arms seems to be IIII. I guess this can be it: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces29660.htmlNo year can be read on the obverse. This couldn't have been possible without your help. Thank you so much! Edited by pcm2007
01/30/2018 07:59 am
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
1.-  2.-  Any way to remove the stains on coin #2? Thanks, Pedro
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
651 Posts |
1. United States 1/2 dime or dime 1854
2. Nepal 10 paisa 1971
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
I think #1 is 10 cash from 1912. It's more difficult to me to date #2 and #3 as I cannot identify the year symbols
Edited by pcm2007
02/02/2018 4:33 pm
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
I think this is not a real coin, but I'd appreciate any information about it. Diameter is 12.5 mm.   Thank you! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
Going up to the Chinese coins, you are right with the first one being a 10 cash piece from 1912. The second coin is a slightly older 10 cash piece, dating from 1906 from the Hubei Province. The pictures on this example look a little different, but there are slightly different varieties (like an uncircled dragon, which is probably yours). For the third one—while your other 1 cash piece was identified as being Qianlong Boo-chiowan—this one is a Daoguang Boo-chiowan type. Otherwise saying, it is slightly more modern than the other, being made from 1821 to 1850 ( link!). Even so, I will say that the Daoguang cash piece does look quite odd, especially looking at the rims and the colour. Now, I am no expert in determining coins' authenticities, but going back to the Quianlong cash piece, I am not at all convinced that that one is a counterfeit. There are two different types of those coins, with the biggest difference being in the top character on the side with four characters. Yours just looks like a very corroded version of the backwards-J one, rather than the more common Z-like type. Edited by Joseph7420
02/05/2018 11:21 pm
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
@Joseph7420 Thank you very much!
Yes the Daouang coin has a narrower rim and the simbol on the right has just one point stroke on its left instead of two. I have not been able to find one with that symbol.
Edited by pcm2007
02/06/2018 08:16 am
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
Hello! Any idea about this coin?   Thank you! |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United Kingdom
17940 Posts |
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
Thanks Rob!
Yes, here we say Hola! :)
Nice to meet you. I'm an avid collector of British coins from Queen Victoria onwards, by the way.
best regards,
Pedro
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
|
|
New Member
Spain
18 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Russian Federation
5174 Posts |
1) Ethiopia, one of the Haile Selassie types of 1944. Not sure what the denomination is; there's a difference in size (which I don't know) and a slight difference in lettering (which I can't read).
2) Pakistan, 1 rupee 2006.
3) Austrian Empire, 4 kreuzer 1861-A.
4) Copy of an early medieval portrait denier of Charles (don't know enough to say which Charles, or the origin of the copy).
5) Brazil, ca. 1823-32, 80 reis, counterstamped with new value 40 reis in 1835. Can't find the undertype date, unfortunately.
No idea on number 6, can't see any 1656 anywhere.
6) Austrian Empire, 1 kreuzer. Not sure on the date, but looks like 1858 (one of the commonest dates for the type). Can't see the mintmark at all.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
2895 Posts |
|
|
Page 3 of 3
|
Replies: 36 / Views: 5,765 |
Page 3 of 3
|
First Page
Previous Page
Posted 01/30/2018 08:12 am
