| Author |
Replies: 24 / Views: 3,464 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Isn't it the dot between E and PLURIBUS?.....and not a die chip?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
The 1913-S auction is still running and clearly a genuine coin. The seller wants $2.66 shipping though and with a $0.99 opening bid that's $3.65 delivered which is more than the coin is worth IMO (a Good with damage).
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19969 Posts |
Looks genuine to me. Not sure why anyone would fake such an inexpensive coin in the first place.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
No question genuine - cannot figure out what the OP is possibly thinking of. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
They seem original to me . Look at this 1910 : 100 % original  
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15509 Posts |
Appears genuine to me ... wondering why the OP is stating otherwise. 
Take a look at my other hobby ... http://www.jk-dk.art
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
66 Posts |
No one read my post, so there is no use responding any further
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
With complete respect, we have read everything you've posted here. There is simply no logic or reason to your claim and we're just trying to say so politely. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
Both the coins you've posted stating to be counterfeit are 100% real
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
The wear is not exactly the same, but it is similar. Of course you would expect that on two coins with the same design and similar amounts of wear. I don't see the defects you are talking about, and WHERE on the left wheat stalk are you seeing raised lunps from a die chip? The only raised lumps I am seeing are the remains of worn wheat grains.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36862 Posts |
No red flags as to being fake.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
772 Posts |
I read all of both posts before reading this. I can see that the wear on both is somewhat similar, but that doesn't prove anything. Just because someone took his listings down doesn't mean anything. Quite possibly he took your word for it, took both listings down, and had an expert look at the coins or did some more research himself to confirm they weren't. If you say they are both fake. SHOW us why, don't tell. Telling doesn't get you anywhere. Point out what in the pictures is wrong, edit them with MS paint or another similar program to circle and point out the indicators showing the same reverse die. Also, include the obverse images in the post. It can be tedious flipping back and forth between ebay and the forum. Just my Two Cents.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
66 Posts |
You are all in denial as the majority of coins are fake. There is no need for me to elaborate further because no one will listen anyway. This forum is filled with people that are rude and I want no part of it.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
54283 Posts |
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 24 / Views: 3,464 |
Page 2 of 2
|