| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,417 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1448 Posts |
Any luster to it? I am thinking 64 very nice toning too
|
|
Valued Member
United States
271 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11898 Posts |
pf58. reverse looks rubbed
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
AU55? where the heck did I get that? I must have been half asleep. I'm going with PF63
|
|
Valued Member
United States
325 Posts |
Is there something going on with the rim, though, or is that just the light?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
50 seems quite low. I don't see any wear at all, actually...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8938 Posts |
 some light field chatter shouldn't knock it below MS62
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
I'm sure there's rub on this one. Problem is the toning is covering up some key areas. When I first saw it I was thinking 58. If you look carefully you can confirm some on the cheek and breasts. Not so much on the knee. I'll update when I get it inhand.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-50? 
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,417 |
Page 2 of 2
|