| Author |
 Replies: 18 / Views: 3,171 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
170 Posts |
Welcome to the forum! It certainly sounds interesting, excited to see!
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189117 Posts |
 to the Community! Quote:
The images are not showing Fixed.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
Need a a pic of the full reverse please.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5589 Posts |
I see no indication of 66 over 36, nor of the monarchs over one another.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3733 Posts |
can you post a full photo of the reverse of the coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9865 Posts |
No improvement.
We need to see the whole reverse please.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
New Member
 United States
4 Posts |
  I am having issues converting my pics although I have them uploaded. Will they convert on your end? I am at a loss on this for now. the pics above is a full reverse of my coin and a George V bust that I have been comparing the coin against. I have used some photo filters to enhance my coin to make bust somewhat more visible. I apologize for my inept forum skills. I appreciate your patience and will accept any help to navigate this forum. thank you! |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5589 Posts |
It looks like post mint damage. Is the marks on the Reverse incuse or raised. It looks like someone was scratching with something to draw
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
its raised around bust.I dont see any deep scratches and leaves, 1 cent, and date lay over the anomaly. I appreciate the feedback and look forward to continue sharing and learning from your experience and knowledge.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
What is weight of this coin ?
|
|
New Member
United States
4 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
Canada
10458 Posts |
This is not what double struck coins and over strikes look like. Usually, the best preservation is in the devices of the second strike, and I see nothing.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
9865 Posts |
Appears to me to be a combination of Pareidolia and some sort of planchet defect. "Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1984 Posts |
Brlane,
the obverse you have posted is not a 1936 Canada obverse. That is a UK obverse. The Canadian obverse was different and UK coins are not the same dimensions.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5589 Posts |
After trying to stare at the 1966 Reverse to see what is/was going on (and trying to avoid Pareidolia), I am coming around to a gouged planchet that was the struck with the '66 dies. It's really hard to tell from the photos and what is raised and what exactly is incuse. |
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 18 / Views: 3,171 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 04/01/2020 12:17 pm
