| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,364 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
306 Posts |
I really want to say 62...ok there I did it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
I suspect it's been cleaned.
Look at the area just in front of Liberty from the nose down the end of the neck, and around stars 1 through 4, and the date.
Why is the field area between those elements untoned but areas immediately adjacent to those features are toned.
I don't see that elsewhere.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1694 Posts |
I think AU-58 I need this one too haha
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
1273 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36826 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
A section of coin looks cleaned. My guess is that NGC net graded to 53.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18684 Posts |
the 93(O) are typically weak in strike. I think this one is better than that. it appear that most of the luster is gone on this one which would lower the grade a notch. AU55
|
|
Valued Member
United States
306 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
857 Posts |
Probably AU-58, with the argument able to be made for a 55 grade or a 60 grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4680 Posts |
Looking at this one again, initially AU58, I could also see a 55 too. Where'd Fenton go?  |
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4989 Posts |
NGC gave this one an AU-53
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
Looks like some rubbing below Liberty's chin to remove a spot or something.
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,364 |
Page 2 of 2
|
First Page
Posted 06/16/2020 8:33 pm
