| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,532 |
Page 2 of 2
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8791 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
 with potentially 023. Also about the end of the night makecents said. I almost said yours had the same debris as the top picture. Glad I looked back and realized it was yours pasted to compare with VV's example. Bedtime 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8791 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7516 Posts |
Thank you all, @makecents, the die scratches on reverse of my 58 run East and West.And you are correct the mint mark on mine has taken a hit on the lower serif and does not have any of the markers of the 023 either.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97586 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7516 Posts |
Thanks Dearborn, wish I could confirm this RPM!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
Hey Chase. I tried something with one that I thought might be your RPM and think this might be it. 1958D-1MM-031. This is why I think that. When placing the lines to key points it looks like both of them line up. The only difference is the PMD your LWC has gone through. I was not sure if the PMD could have increased the split in the upper serif. Of course this is a very rough method with each MM picture at different scales, but it was a shot in the dark. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7516 Posts |
@curly , thanks for the works I think so too, that might be it. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
Your words are spot on Chase. I was in the basement filling the wood furnace and thought about my response, and thought I might have missed a statement about a marker on the coin that I did not pay attention to. Cause the last thing I want to do is speak without taking in what all others have presented. Especially with all the knowledge others have worked hard to obtain.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
8791 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@CHASE: IMHO you are with this coin much more close with 1958D-1MM-014, if you overlap your coin with that from cooper,, fit better then 31.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
I can see what silviosi is saying. There is a particular aspect of the comparison that does not match up though. The size and shape of the center of the D. Here is a side-by-side of 031-Chase-014. I wonder if both RPMs are really the same die, but at different stages of its life? Even the flowlines seem to have matching aspects. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7516 Posts |
Yes I see that, I agree they are very close even on the MM position, thanks guys.
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
I need help with finding the rarity of this coin. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
 to CCF Jrenolds. You need to go to this thread http://goccf.com/f/5and start a new one with your question. In subject line place something like this (2021P Lincoln Shield - state your question) This way others can properly respond and reference later. Also provide better pictures that are in focus of both obverse and reverse.
Edited by Curly82ABN 03/19/2023 12:45 pm
|
|
Page 2 of 2
|
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,532 |
Page 2 of 2
|